ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016
Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Cost of Single-Site Robotic Surgery and Single-Site Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecological Diseases: The Era of Single-Site Robotic Surgery May Have Arrived.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Gynecologic Benign Pathology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update.Journal of robotic surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of SR-ENS-600endoscopic surgical system in benign and malignant gynecological diseases: a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial with 63 cases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Trial
- Robotic transumbilical single-site re-staging surgery of ovarian granulosa cell tumor - case report and technical points with video.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- The feasibility and short-term safety of single-site hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study of a novel robotic platform.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- What is the role of robotic surgery in ovarian cystectomy with fertility preservation?Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Coaxial-Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy: Surgical Outcomes Compared with Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy by Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy: Literature Review and Procedure Description.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy as a scarless and gasless surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2018Article
- Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.Journal of robotic surgery · 2018Article
- Advances on minimally invasive approach for benign total hysterectomy: a systematic review.F1000Research · 2017Review
- [Advances in Surgical Treatment of Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2016Review
- Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.F1000Research · 2016Review
- A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Single-Incision Hysterectomy Outcomes With and Without Robotic Assistance.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic single-site (RSS-H) and laparoendoscopic single-site total hysterectomy (LESS-H) and to evaluate the feasibility of RSS-H in patients with benign gynecologic disease.
methodsThe RSS-H was performed using the da Vinci single-site surgical platform, and the LESS-H using a single multi-channel port system at the umbilicus. Among 467 consecutive patients who had undergone total hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease, surgical outcomes were compared between RSS-H group (n = 25) and LESS-H group (n = 442) after propensity score matching.
resultsAll operations were completed robotically and laparoscopically without conversion to laparotomy, respectively. The RSS-H group had longer operating times and less operative bleeding compared to the LESS-H group. While the LESS-H showed 1.4% of major complication rate, the RSS-H had no perioperative complication. Even after propensity score matching, the RSS-H still showed longer operating times (170.9 vs 94.1 min, p < 0.0001) and less operative bleeding (median estimated blood loss, 20 vs 50 ml, p = 0.009; mean hemoglobin drop, 1.6 vs 2.0 g/dl, p = 0.038) than the LESS-H.
conclusionsThe RSS-H could be a feasible and safe procedure in appropriately selected patients with benign gynecologic disease, and further experience and technical refinements will continue to improve operative results. Prospective randomized trials will permit the evaluation of the potential benefits of the RSS surgery as a minimally invasive surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.