Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26091899›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

RNA-Seq analysis of resistant and susceptible potato varieties during the early stages of potato virus Y infection.

Aymeric Goyer, Launa Hamlin, James M Crosslin, Alex Buchanan, Jeff H Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylase/Hydrolase Downregulation IncreasesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Global expression patterns ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  17. Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aymeric GoyerDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. aymeric.goyer@oregonstate.edu.
Launa HamlinUSDA-ARS, Prosser, WA, USA. Launa.Hamlin@ars.usda.gov.
James M CrosslinUSDA-ARS, Prosser, WA, USA. Jim.Crosslin@ars.usda.gov.
Alex BuchananDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. buchanae@gmail.com.
Jeff H ChangDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. changj@science.oregonstate.edu.
Oregon State University · USBiocom · US

Funding

NB Regression and HOA Inference for RNA-Seq Gene Expression AnalysisR01GM104977 · NIGMS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DI, YANMING · 2012 to 2014
$553k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104977NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM104977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPotato virus Y (PVY) is one of the most important plant viruses affecting potato production. The interactions between potato and PVY are complex and the outcome of the interactions depends on the potato genotype, the PVY strain, and the environmental conditions. A potato cultivar can induce resistance to a specific PVY strain, yet be susceptible to another. How a single potato cultivar responds to PVY in both compatible and incompatible interactions is not clear.

resultsIn this study, we used RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) to investigate and compare the transcriptional changes in leaves of potato upon inoculation with PVY. We used two potato varieties: Premier Russet, which is resistant to the PVY strain O (PVY(O)) but susceptible to the strain NTN (PVY(NTN)), and Russet Burbank, which is susceptible to all PVY strains that have been tested. Leaves were inoculated with PVY(O) or PVY(NTN), and samples were collected 4 and 10 h post inoculation (hpi). A larger number of differentially expressed (DE) genes were found in the compatible reactions compared to the incompatible reaction. For all treatments, the majority of DE genes were down-regulated at 4 hpi and up-regulated at 10 hpi. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis showed enrichment of the biological process GO term "Photosynthesis, light harvesting" specifically in PVY(O)-inoculated Premier Russet leaves, while the GO term "nucleosome assembly" was largely overrepresented in PVY(NTN)-inoculated Premier Russet leaves and PVY(O)-inoculated Russet Burbank leaves but not in PVY(O)-inoculated Premier Russet leaves. Fewer genes were DE over 4-fold in the incompatible reaction compared to the compatible reactions. Amongst these, five genes were DE only in PVY(O)-inoculated Premier Russet leaves, and all five were down-regulated. These genes are predicted to encode for a putative ABC transporter, a MYC2 transcription factor, a VQ-motif containing protein, a non-specific lipid-transfer protein, and a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase-hydroxylase.

conclusionsOur results show that the incompatible and compatible reactions in Premier Russet shared more similarities, in particular during the initial response, than the compatible reactions in the two different hosts. Our results identify potential key processes and genes that determine the fate of the reaction, compatible or incompatible, between PVY and its host.

Indexed as

Down-RegulationGenome, ViralGenotypePlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPlant VirusesPotyvirusRNASequence Analysis, RNASolanum tuberosumTranscription, GeneticUp-RegulationRNA

Identifiers

PMID26091899
PMCPMC4475319
OpenAlexW1659622195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.