Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26091691›Full record

ArticleExpert review of vaccines2015

The case for vaccine development in the strategy to eradicate river blindness (onchocerciasis) from Africa.

Benjamin L Makepeace, Simon A Babayan, Sara Lustigman, David W Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of vaccines, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lessons from the genomes and transcriptomes of filarial nematodes.Molecular and biochemical parasitology · 2017
    Review
  11. Ivermectin - Old Drug, New Tricks?Trends in parasitology · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin L MakepeaceInstitute of Infection & Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Science Park IC2, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK.
Simon A Babayan
Sara Lustigman
David W Taylor
University of Liverpool · GBNew York Blood Center · USUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

The development of a recombinant vaccine against human onchocerciasisR01AI078314 · NIAID · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI LUSTIGMAN, SARA · 2009 to 2021
$7.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI078314NIAID NIH HHS R01AI078314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Onchocerciasis or river blindness is a neglected parasitic disease causing severe dermatitis and visual impairment, predominantly in Africa. Historically, onchocerciasis control targeted vector breeding sites, but the current strategy relies on mass administration of a single drug, ivermectin. As programmatic goals shift from reducing public health impact to active elimination, sole reliance on ivermectin is threatened by contraindications in areas coendemic for loiasis, an inability to break transmission in some foci, and the emergence of drug resistance. Here, we argue that prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines would accelerate elimination efforts and safeguard the enormous strides made in onchocerciasis control. These vaccines could be based on one or more of three lead candidates identified by a newly formed transatlantic partnership, The Onchocerciasis Vaccine for Africa Initiative.

Indexed as

Disease Transmission, InfectiousDrug DiscoveryHumansImmunotherapyInternational CooperationOnchocerciasis, OcularVaccinesVaccinescysteine proteinase inhibitorfilarial nematodesimmunoprophylaxisLoaOnchocerca volvulus

Identifiers

PMID26091691
PMCPMC11148793
OpenAlexW1920750847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.