Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26091583›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Turkish version of the Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire: assessment of reliability and validity.

Sevim Bavbek, Seçil Kepil Özdemir, Beyza Doğanay Erdoğan, Işıl Karaboğa, Suna Büyüköztürk, Aslı Gelincik, İnsu Yılmaz, Özlem Göksel, Adile Berna Dursun, Gül Karakaya and 8 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sevim BavbekDepartment of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. sevim.bavbek@medicine.ankara.edu.tr.
Seçil Kepil ÖzdemirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine, Aydın, Turkey.
Beyza Doğanay ErdoğanDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Işıl KaraboğaDepartment of Psychiatry, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Suna BüyüköztürkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aslı GelincikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
İnsu YılmazDepartment of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.
Özlem GökselDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Unit, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Adile Berna DursunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University School of Medicine, Rize, Turkey.
Gül KarakayaDepartment of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ali Fuat KalyoncuDepartment of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ferhan ÖzşekerDepartment of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Gülden Paşaoğlu Karakış, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ferda Öner ErkekolDepartment of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Gözde KöycüDepartment of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Metin KerenDepartment of Chest Diseases, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ilaria BaiardiniAllergy and Respiratory Diseases Clinic - DIMI, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Antonino RomanoAllergy Unit, Complesso Integrato Columbus, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe first disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire in patients with drug hypersensitivity, Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q), was developed and validated recently. The aim of this study was to assess validity, reliability and responsiveness to interventions of the Turkish version of the DrHy-Q.

methodsThe Turkish version of the DrHy-Q was administered to prospectively enrolled 736 patients with drug hypersensitivity from ten allergy units. To assess validity, all patients completed the validated Turkish version of Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI). For test-retest reliability, 182 patients completed the DrHy-Q 1 week after the first questionnaire administration without any intervention. Responsiveness was assessed on 97 patients who had a DrHy-Q recorded at a follow-up visit after the intervention.

resultsThe internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the scale were adequate (Cronbach's alpha = 0.934, intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.783). The DrHy-Q scores showed weak negative correlations with the PGWBI total and domain scores (r = - 0.378 to -0.254, p < 0.001). DrHy-Q was able to discriminate the patients with one drug hypersensitivity reaction from the patients with two and above two reactions (p = 0.012 and p < 0.001, respectively), and the patients who experienced a respiratory reaction from the patients who did not (p = 0.018). However, it did not discriminate the patients with comorbid disease including psychiatric comorbidity (p > 0.05). The baseline DrHy-Q scores were significantly higher than the post-intervention scores (p = 0.008).

conclusionThe Turkish version of DrHy-Q is reliable and valid for evaluating quality of life in patients with drug hypersensitivity, and it appeared responsive to interventions.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedDrug HypersensitivityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsTranslationsTurkeyYoung AdultDisease-specific questionnairesDrug allergyDrug hypersensitivityQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.