ArticleScientific reports2015
High-field functional magnetic resonance imaging of vocalization processing in marmosets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Voice patches in the marmoset auditory cortex revealed by multimodal optical imaging.Science advances · 2026Article
- A large annotated dataset of vocalizations by common marmosets.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Ultra-high Field fMRI Reveals Effect of Ketamine on Vocal Processing in Common Marmosets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Functional mapping of auditory responses to complex sounds under light anesthesia in rhesus macaques.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- A population of neurons selective for human voice in the monkey brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Mapping of facial and vocal processing in common marmosets with ultra-high field fMRI.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Evolutionary continuity and divergence of auditory dorsal and ventral pathways in primates revealed by ultra-high field diffusion MRI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The neurobiology of vocal communication in marmosets.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023Review
- Quantitative models of auditory cortical processing.Hearing research · 2023Review
- Distinct functional levels of human voice processing in the auditory cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Neural responses in human superior temporal cortex support coding of voice representations.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Differences in dogs' event-related potentials in response to human and dog vocal stimuli; a non-invasive study.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Morphometric analysis of astrocytes in vocal production circuits of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).The Journal of comparative neurology · 2022Article
- Hierarchical cortical networks of "voice patches" for processing voices in human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Comparative connectomics of the primate social brain.NeuroImage · 2021Review
- Simultaneous functional MRI of two awake marmosets.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Distinct neuron populations for simple and compound calls in the primary auditory cortex of awake marmosets.National science review · 2021Article
- Neuronal selectivity to complex vocalization features emerges in the superficial layers of primary auditory cortex.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Marmoset Monkeys.ILAR journal · 2020Review
- Altered Resting-State Functional Connectivity Between Awake and Isoflurane Anesthetized Marmosets.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vocalizations are behaviorally critical sounds, and this behavioral importance is reflected in the ascending auditory system, where conspecific vocalizations are increasingly over-represented at higher processing stages. Recent evidence suggests that, in macaques, this increasing selectivity for vocalizations might culminate in a cortical region that is densely populated by vocalization-preferring neurons. Such a region might be a critical node in the representation of vocal communication sounds, underlying the recognition of vocalization type, caller and social context. These results raise the questions of whether cortical specializations for vocalization processing exist in other species, their cortical location, and their relationship to the auditory processing hierarchy. To explore cortical specializations for vocalizations in another species, we performed high-field fMRI of the auditory cortex of a vocal New World primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Using a sparse imaging paradigm, we discovered a caudal-rostral gradient for the processing of conspecific vocalizations in marmoset auditory cortex, with regions of the anterior temporal lobe close to the temporal pole exhibiting the highest preference for vocalizations. These results demonstrate similar cortical specializations for vocalization processing in macaques and marmosets, suggesting that cortical specializations for vocal processing might have evolved before the lineages of these species diverged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.