Trial reportJournal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology2015
Safety and Efficacy from an 8 Week Double-Blind Trial and a 26 Week Open-Label Extension of Asenapine in Adolescents with Schizophrenia.
Trial report in Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An 8-week, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized, Fixed-dose Efficacy and Safety Trial of Asenapine in Adolescent Subjects With Schizophrenia
A 26-week, Multi-center, Open-label, Flexible Dose, Long-term Safety Trial of Asenapine in Adolescent Subjects With Schizophrenia
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Practice Guideline on the Choice of First Antipsychotic Medicine for Females Experiencing a First-Episode of Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Guideline
- Antipsychotic Drugs and Dysregulated Glucose Homeostasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Sex Differences in Serum Prolactin Levels in Children and Adolescents on Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Lurasidone compared to other atypical antipsychotic monotherapies for adolescent schizophrenia: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Harms of Antipsychotics in Children and Young Adults: A Systematic Review Update.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2018Pooled it
- Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Blonanserin Oral Tablet in Adolescents with Schizophrenia: A 52-Week, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Study.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2022Trial
- Asenapine pharmacokinetics and tolerability in a pediatric population.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in Adolescents with Schizophrenia: A 6-Week, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2017Trial
- Review
- Risk of extrapyramidal symptoms associated with antipsychotic drugs in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trials.Research square · 2026Article
- Neurological Adverse Effects of Antipsychotic Medication in Children and Young People.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Reassessing mirtazapine and akathisia: A case report on its efficacy in treating severe, treatment-resistant akathisia and a review of the evidence.SAGE open medical case reports · 2024Article
- Practitioner Review: Psychosis in children and adolescents.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2023Review
- Lost in Translation: Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia.Cureus · 2023Review
- The Influence of Long-Term Treatment with Asenapine on Liver Cytochrome P450 Expression and Activity in the Rat. The Involvement of Different Mechanisms.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Asenapine: an atypical antipsychotic with atypical formulations.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2021Review
- Safety of 80 antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-attention-deficit/hyperactivity medications and mood stabilizers in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders: a large scale systematic meta-review of 78 adverse effects.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020Article
- Asenapine Treatment in Pediatric Patients with Bipolar I Disorder or Schizophrenia: A Review.Paediatric drugs · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of asenapine in adolescents with schizophrenia.
methodsIn an 8 week, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, subjects (12-17 years of age) meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for schizophrenia were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, asenapine 2.5 mg b.i.d., or asenapine 5 mg b.i.d. Subjects who completed the 8 week acute study could participate in a 26 week flexible-dose asenapine-only open-label extension (OLE).
resultsA similar percentage of subjects completed treatment on day 56 (2.5 mg b.i.d. (n=98): 83%; 5 mg b.i.d. [n=106]: 79%; placebo [n=102]: 79%). In the mixed model for repeated measures analysis of the primary end-point (with Hochberg correction for multiplicity), least squares (LS) mean differences between asenapine and placebo on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at day 56 were not significant (-4.8 for 2.5 mg b.i.d., p=0.070; -5.6 for 5 mg b.i.d., p=0.064). Significant improvement in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score was observed in the 5 mg b.i.d. group versus placebo on day 56 (LS mean -0.3, p=0.024). In the acute phase, ≥7% weight gain and the composite event of somnolence, sedation, and hypersomnia were more common in both asenapine groups than in the placebo group. Akathisia, fasting glucose elevation, and extrapyramidal syndrome were more common in the 5 mg b.i.d. group than in the placebo group. There were no unexpected adverse events in the OLE, and PANSS total scores decreased by -16.1 points in the group previously treated with placebo (n=62) and by -11.2 points in the continuous asenapine group (n=131) from OLE baseline to week 26.
conclusionsAlthough improvements in PANSS total score at day 56 of the acute phase were numerically greater for both asenapine 2.5 and 5 mg b.i.d. than for placebo and were maintained in the OLE, the primary end-point did not achieve statistical significance in the acute phase. No new or unexpected safety concerns were detected during the acute phase or after an additional 26 weeks of asenapine treatment in the adolescent population with schizophrenia. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT01190254 and NCT1190267 at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.