ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2015
Adjuvants may reduce in vivo transfection levels for DNA vaccination in mice leading to reduced antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunization with a multi-antigen targeted DNA vaccine eliminates chemoresistant pancreatic cancer by disrupting tumor-stromal cell crosstalk.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Harnessing Recent Advances in Synthetic DNA and Electroporation Technologies for Rapid Vaccine Development Against COVID-19 and Other Emerging Infectious Diseases.Frontiers in medical technology · 2020Review
- DNA-Loaded Cationic Liposomes Efficiently Function as a Vaccine against Malarial Proteins.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2017Article
- 8th vaccine renaissance: A creative nexus for vaccine developers.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adjuvants for DNA vaccination are designed to promote transformation of transgenes into target cells and increase inflammation in the site of injection, with resultant immune cell recruitment. Numerous studies indicated cationic liposomes as effective adjuvants for DNA vaccination due to their ability to promote in vivo transfection and innate immune system activation. Commercial reagents as Adjuplex and in vivo-JetPEI are also intended to facilitate DNA vaccination. Here, we evaluate the adjuvant properties of cationic liposomes, Adjuplex and in vivo-JetPEI compared to injection of DNA without adjuvant. In mice vaccinated with piggyBac pDNA vaccines, we assessed in vivo antigen expression, innate immune responses in draining lymph nodes, and antigen-specific T cell responses in spleens and blood. Surprisingly, vaccination with DNA in PBS emerged as the most efficient in promoting in vivo transfection and consequent antigen expression, while the addition of adjuvant reduced the amount of antigen expressed. On the other hand, we discovered higher numbers of innate immune cells and activated dendritic cells in the lymph nodes of mice injected with adjuvants than those vaccinated in PBS. The analysis of eGFP-specific immune responses revealed that all the different immunizations induced functional antigen-specific T cells in spleens, although only T cells generated by non-adjuvant vaccination and Adjuplex were identified in the blood of vaccinated mice. These results provide insight into the effects of these 3 adjuvants and may facilitate appropriate use off adjuvants by researchers using DNA vaccines in laboratory animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.