Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26091074›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Carrier Detection.

Monica Alejandra Anaya-Segura, Froylan Arturo García-Martínez, Luis Angel Montes-Almanza, Benjamín-Gomez Díaz, Guillermina Avila-Ramírez, Ikuri Alvarez-Maya, Ramón Mauricio Coral-Vazquez, Paul Mondragón-Terán, Rosa Elena Escobar-Cedillo, Noemí García-Calderón and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of Two Novel Variants of thePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Biomarkers in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Current heart failure reports · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Circulating Biomarkers in Muscular Dystrophies: Disease and Therapy Monitoring.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Monica Alejandra Anaya-SeguraResearch Center in Technology and Design Assistance of Jalisco State (CIATEJ, AC), National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT), Guadalajara 44270, Mexico. monica207383614@gmail.com.
Froylan Arturo García-MartínezNational Medical Centre \"20 de Noviembre\", Institute for Social Security of State Workers, Mexico City 03100, Mexico. elfroy77_@hotmail.com.
Luis Angel Montes-AlmanzaNational Medical Centre \"20 de Noviembre\", Institute for Social Security of State Workers, Mexico City 03100, Mexico. wicho_unam@hotmail.com.
Benjamín-Gomez DíazNational Institute of Rehabilitation, Mexico City 14389, Mexico. bgodiaz@gmail.com.
Guillermina Avila-RamírezFaculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico. guilleavila2000@yahoo.com.
Ikuri Alvarez-MayaResearch Center in Technology and Design Assistance of Jalisco State (CIATEJ, AC), National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT), Guadalajara 44270, Mexico. ialvarez@ciatej.mx.
Ramón Mauricio Coral-VazquezStudies Section of Postgraduate and Research, School of Medicine, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico City 11340, Mexico. rmcoralv@gmail.com.
Paul Mondragón-TeránNational Medical Centre \"20 de Noviembre\", Institute for Social Security of State Workers, Mexico City 03100, Mexico. p.mondragonteran@gmail.com.
Rosa Elena Escobar-CedilloNational Institute of Rehabilitation, Mexico City 14389, Mexico. rescobarmex@gmail.com.
Noemí García-CalderónAsociación de Distrofia Muscular de Occidente A.C., Guadalajara 44380, Mexico. dranoemigarcia@gmail.com.
Norma Alejandra Vazquez-CardenasFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 45129, Mexico. avc200180@yahoo.com.mx.
Silvia GarcíaNational Medical Centre \"20 de Noviembre\", Institute for Social Security of State Workers, Mexico City 03100, Mexico. rolasil@yahoo.com.mx.
Luz Berenice López-HernandezNational Medical Centre \"20 de Noviembre\", Institute for Social Security of State Workers, Mexico City 03100, Mexico. lblhmedgen@gmail.com.
Institute for Social Security and Services for State Workers · MXInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitación · MXSecretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXTecnológico Nacional de México · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Guadalajara · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive biological indicators of the absence/presence or progress of the disease that could be used to support diagnosis and to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment are of utmost importance in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). This neuromuscular disorder affects male children, causing weakness and disability, whereas female relatives are at risk of being carriers of the disease. A biomarker with both high sensitivity and specificity for accurate prediction is preferred. Until now creatine kinase (CK) levels have been used for DMD diagnosis but these fail to assess disease progression. Herein we examined the potential applicability of serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and matrix metalloproteinase 2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1, myostatin (GDF-8) and follistatin (FSTN) as non-invasive biomarkers to distinguish between DMD steroid naïve patients and healthy controls of similar age and also for carrier detection. Our data suggest that serum levels of MMP-9, GDF-8 and FSTN are useful to discriminate DMD from controls (p < 0.05), to correlate with some neuromuscular assessments for DMD, and also to differentiate between Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) and Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) patients. In DMD individuals under steroid treatment, GDF-8 levels increased as FSTN levels decreased, resembling the proportions of these proteins in healthy controls and also the baseline ratio of patients without steroids. GDF-8 and FSTN serum levels were also useful for carrier detection (p < 0.05). Longitudinal studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm that these molecules correlate with disease progression. The biomarkers presented herein could potentially outperform CK levels for carrier detection and also harbor potential for monitoring disease progression.

Indexed as

HeterozygoteBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersExtracellular Matrix ProteinsbiomarkersDuchenneFSTNGDF-8MMP-2MMP-9monitoringTIMP-1

Identifiers

PMID26091074
PMCPMC6272409
OpenAlexW1522403604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.