Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26091066›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Differences in Unfolded Protein Response Pathway Activation in the Lenses of Three Types of Cataracts.

Jing Yang, Sheng Zhou, Jianjun Gu, Yujuan Wang, Minfei Guo, Yizhi Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification of co-segregatingFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Through theGenes · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2018
    Article
  19. Age-related cataracts: Role of unfolded protein response, CaProgress in retinal and eye research · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing YangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sheng ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jianjun GuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yujuan WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Minfei GuoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Huichang County People's Hospital, Jiangxi, China.
Yizhi LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the activation of three unfolded protein response (UPR) pathways in the lenses of age-related, high myopia-related and congenital cataracts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Lens specimens were collected from patients during small incision cataract surgery. Lenses from young cadaver eyes were collected as normal controls. Real-time PCR and Western blotting were performed to detect the expression of GRP78, p-eIF2α, spliced XBP1, ATF6, ATF4 and p-IRE1α in the lenses of normal human subjects and patients with age-related, myopia-related or congenital cataracts.

resultsIn the lenses of the age-related and high myopia-related cataract groups, the protein levels of ATF6, p-eIF2α and p-IRE1α and the gene expression levels of spliced XBP1, GRP78, ATF6 and ATF4 were greatly increased. Additionally, in the congenital cataract group, the protein levels of p-eIF2α and p-IRE1α and the gene expression levels of spliced XBP1, GRP78 and ATF4 were greatly increased. However, the protein and gene expression levels of ATF6 were not up-regulated in the congenital cataract group compared with the normal control group.

conclusionsThe UPR is activated via different pathways in the lenses of age-related, high myopia-related and congenital cataracts. UPR activation via distinct pathways might play important roles in cataractogenesis mechanisms in different types of cataracts.

Indexed as

Activating Transcription Factor 4Activating Transcription Factor 6CataractDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEndoribonucleasesEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansLens, CrystallineProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsRNA, MessengerRNA SplicingTranscription FactorsActivating Transcription Factor 4Activating Transcription Factor 6ATF4 protein, humanATF6 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEndoribonucleasesERN1 protein, humanEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2Heat-Shock ProteinsHSPA5 protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsX-Box Binding Protein 1XBP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26091066
PMCPMC4475046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.