ArticleCell2015
Healing the NIH-Funded Biomedical Research Enterprise.
Article in Cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why can't we make research grant allocation systems more consistent? A personal opinion.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- How to get and keep your lab funded.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018Article
- Epidemiology at a time for unity.International journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
- Article
- Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.PloS one · 2018Article
- How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- Supporting novel biomedical research via multilayer collaboration networks.Applied network science · 2016Article
- The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research.Current topics in developmental biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Many feel that the R01 grant system supporting biomedical research in the U.S. is broken, discouraging entry of young investigators into the system and inadequately supporting more established investigators. Here, I argue for a "person-not-project"-based scheme that would permit creative, unfettered research by new investigators, better tie ongoing research contributions to continued funding, and help match the number of investigators seeking support with available funds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.