Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26091007›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Age-Specific Cutoff Value for the Application of Percent Free Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) in Chinese Men with Serum PSA Levels of 4.0-10.0 ng/ml.

Rui Chen, Yiran Huang, Xiaobing Cai, Liping Xie, Dalin He, Liqun Zhou, Chuanliang Xu, Xu Gao, Shancheng Ren, Fubo Wang and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Rui ChenDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yiran HuangRenji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, No.1630 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Xiaobing CaiDepartment of Health Care, PLA Headquarters of the General Staff Guard Bureau, Beijing 100017, China.
Liping XieDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.
Dalin HeDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277 west Yanta Road, Xi'an 710061, China.
Liqun ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer center, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Chuanliang XuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Xu GaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Shancheng RenDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Fubo WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Lulin MaDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, No 49,North Garden Road, Haidian Dist, Beijing, China.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37# 610041, Chengdu Sichuan, China.
Changjun YinState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; No.300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; No.300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Ye TianDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Zhongquan SunDepartment of Urology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, #221 West Yan'an Road, Shanghai 20040, China.
Qiang FuShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Yishan Rd.600 Shanghai, China.
Qiang DingHuashan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 12, WuLuMuQi Middle Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Junhua ZhengDepartment of Urology, Tenth People's Hospital; Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zhangqun YeDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave. Wuhan, 430030, China.
Dingwei YeFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, #270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Danfeng XuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jianquan HouThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 ShiZhi Road, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Kexin XuPeking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhomen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
Jianlin YuanDepartment of Urology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changlexi Road, Xi'an, 710032 China.
Xin GaoDepartment of Urology, 3rd Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Tiehe Road 600#, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Chunxiao LiuDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253 Industrial Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Tiejun PanDepartment of Urology, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, No. 627 Wuluo Rd, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China.
Yinghao SunDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium
Second Military Medical University · CNChanghai Hospital · CNPeking University · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNFudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNHuadong Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNRenji Hospital · CNShanghai Changzheng Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSouthern Medical University · CNTongji University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNWuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe influence of age on the performance of percent free prostate-specific antigen (%fPSA) in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) in East Asians is controversial. We tested the diagnostic performance of %fPSA in a multi-center biopsy cohort in China and identified the proper age-specific cutoff values to avoid unnecessary biopsies.

methodsConsecutive patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4.0-10.0 ng/ml or 10.1-20.0 ng/ml who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided or transperineal prostate biopsy were enrolled from 22 Chinese medical centers from Jan 1, 2010 to Dec 31, 2013. The diagnostic accuracy of PSA and %fPSA was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Age-specific cutoff values were calculated using ROC curve analysis.

resultsThe median %fPSA was much lower in younger patients compared with older patients with a PSA level of 4.0-10.0 ng/ml or 10.1-20.0 ng/ml. The AUC of %fPSA was higher than PSA only in older patients. In patients aged 50 to 59 years, %fPSA failed to improve the diagnosis compared with PSA in these two PSA ranges. Age-specific cutoff values were 24%, 27% and 32% for patients aged 60-69, 70-79 and ≥80 years, respectively, to reduce unnecessary biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4.0-10.0 ng/ml to detect 90% of all PCa.

conclusionsThe effectiveness of %fPSA is correlated with age in the Chinese population. Age-specific cutoff values would help avoid unnecessary biopsies in the Chinese population.

Indexed as

AgedAge DistributionAge FactorsChinaHumansKallikreinsMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesROC CurveKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID26091007
PMCPMC4474838
OpenAlexW2213797542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.