Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26090883›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Combining a Spatial Model and Demand Forecasts to Map Future Surface Coal Mining in Appalachia.

Michael P Strager, Jacquelyn M Strager, Jeffrey S Evans, Judy K Dunscomb, Brad J Kreps, Aaron E Maxwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael P StragerDivision of Resource Management, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America.
Jacquelyn M StragerNatural Resource Analysis Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America.
Jeffrey S EvansThe Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, Colorado, and Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, United States of America.
Judy K DunscombThe Nature Conservancy, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Brad J KrepsThe Nature Conservancy, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Aaron E MaxwellAlderson Broaddus University, Philippi, West Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the locations of future surface coal mining in Appalachia is challenging for a number of reasons. Economic and regulatory factors impact the coal mining industry and forecasts of future coal production do not specifically predict changes in location of future coal production. With the potential environmental impacts from surface coal mining, prediction of the location of future activity would be valuable to decision makers. The goal of this study was to provide a method for predicting future surface coal mining extents under changing economic and regulatory forecasts through the year 2035. This was accomplished by integrating a spatial model with production demand forecasts to predict (1 km2) gridded cell size land cover change. Combining these two inputs was possible with a ratio which linked coal extraction quantities to a unit area extent. The result was a spatial distribution of probabilities allocated over forecasted demand for the Appalachian region including northern, central, southern, and eastern Illinois coal regions. The results can be used to better plan for land use alterations and potential cumulative impacts.

Indexed as

Coal MiningForecastingSpatial AnalysisAppalachian Region

Identifiers

PMID26090883
PMCPMC4474888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.