ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Emergence of Functional Specificity in Balanced Networks with Synaptic Plasticity.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A brain-constrained neural model of cognition and language with NEST: transitioning from the Felix framework.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Synapse-type-specific competitive Hebbian learning forms functional recurrent networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Whole-Brain Evaluation of Cortical Microconnectomes.eNeuro · 2023Article
- Synaptic weights that correlate with presynaptic selectivity increase decoding performance.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Emergence of probabilistic representation in the neural network of primary visual cortex.iScience · 2022Article
- Excitatory-inhibitory balance modulates the formation and dynamics of neuronal assemblies in cortical networks.Science advances · 2021Article
- Sensory coding and contrast invariance emerge from the control of plastic inhibition over emergent selectivity.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Modeling the role of gap junctions between excitatory neurons in the developing visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Inhibitory stabilization and cortical computation.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Embodied working memory during ongoing input streams.PloS one · 2021Article
- Event-Based Update of Synapses in Voltage-Based Learning Rules.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Randomly connected networks generate emergent selectivity and predict decoding properties of large populations of neurons.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Patterned perturbation of inhibition can reveal the dynamical structure of neural processing.eLife · 2020Article
- Contextual Integration in Cortical and Convolutional Neural Networks.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- From statistical inference to a differential learning rule for stochastic neural networks.Interface focus · 2018Article
- Emergence of spontaneous assembly activity in developing neural networks without afferent input.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Associative properties of structural plasticity based on firing rate homeostasis in recurrent neuronal networks.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Specific excitatory connectivity for feature integration in mouse primary visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Memory replay in balanced recurrent networks.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In rodent visual cortex, synaptic connections between orientation-selective neurons are unspecific at the time of eye opening, and become to some degree functionally specific only later during development. An explanation for this two-stage process was proposed in terms of Hebbian plasticity based on visual experience that would eventually enhance connections between neurons with similar response features. For this to work, however, two conditions must be satisfied: First, orientation selective neuronal responses must exist before specific recurrent synaptic connections can be established. Second, Hebbian learning must be compatible with the recurrent network dynamics contributing to orientation selectivity, and the resulting specific connectivity must remain stable for unspecific background activity. Previous studies have mainly focused on very simple models, where the receptive fields of neurons were essentially determined by feedforward mechanisms, and where the recurrent network was small, lacking the complex recurrent dynamics of large-scale networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Here we studied the emergence of functionally specific connectivity in large-scale recurrent networks with synaptic plasticity. Our results show that balanced random networks, which already exhibit highly selective responses at eye opening, can develop feature-specific connectivity if appropriate rules of synaptic plasticity are invoked within and between excitatory and inhibitory populations. If these conditions are met, the initial orientation selectivity guides the process of Hebbian learning and, as a result, functionally specific and a surplus of bidirectional connections emerge. Our results thus demonstrate the cooperation of synaptic plasticity and recurrent dynamics in large-scale functional networks with realistic receptive fields, highlight the role of inhibition as a critical element in this process, and paves the road for further computational studies of sensory processing in neocortical network models equipped with synaptic plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.