Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26090810›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Ruminal Transcriptomic Analysis of Grass-Fed and Grain-Fed Angus Beef Cattle.

Yaokun Li, José A Carrillo, Yi Ding, YangHua He, Chunping Zhao, Linsen Zan, Jiuzhou Song

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gossypol detoxification in the rumen andAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Diet induced the change of mtDNA copy number and metabolism in Angus cattle.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Infrequently expressed miRNAs in colorectal cancer tissue and tumor molecular phenotype.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yaokun LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, P.R. China, 712100.
José A CarrilloDepartment of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, United States of America.
Yi DingDepartment of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, United States of America.
YangHua HeDepartment of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, United States of America.
Chunping ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, P.R. China, 712100.
Linsen ZanCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, P.R. China, 712100.
Jiuzhou SongDepartment of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, United States of America.
University of Maryland, College Park · USNorthwest A&F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beef represents a major diet component and one of the major sources of protein in human. The beef industry in the United States is currently undergoing changes and is facing increased demands especially for natural grass-fed beef. The grass-fed beef obtained their nutrients directly from pastures, which contained limited assimilable energy but abundant amount of fiber. On the contrary, the grain-fed steers received a grain-based regime that served as an efficient source of high-digestible energy. Lately, ruminant animals have been accused to be a substantial contributor for the green house effect. Therefore, the concerns from environmentalism, animal welfare and public health have driven consumers to choose grass-fed beef. Rumen is one of the key workshops to digest forage constituting a critical step to supply enough nutrients for animals' growth and production. We hypothesize that rumen may function differently in grass- and grain-fed regimes. The objective of this study was to find the differentially expressed genes in the ruminal wall of grass-fed and grain-fed steers, and then explore the potential biopathways. In this study, the RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) method was used to measure the gene expression level in the ruminal wall. The total number of reads per sample ranged from 24,697,373 to 36,714,704. The analysis detected 342 differentially expressed genes between ruminal wall samples of animals raised under different regimens. The Fisher's exact test performed in the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software found 16 significant molecular networks. Additionally, 13 significantly enriched pathways were identified, most of which were related to cell development and biosynthesis. Our analysis demonstrated that most of the pathways enriched with the differentially expressed genes were related to cell development and biosynthesis. Our results provided valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms resulting in the phenotype difference between grass-fed and grain-fed cattle.

Indexed as

Animal FeedEdible GrainGene Expression ProfilingPoaceaeTranscriptomeAnimalsCattleComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksRumenSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID26090810
PMCPMC4475051
OpenAlexW2202000487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.