Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26090664›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Generation of Multicellular Tumor Spheroids with Microwell-Based Agarose Scaffolds for Drug Testing.

Xue Gong, Chao Lin, Jian Cheng, Jiansheng Su, Hang Zhao, Tianlin Liu, Xuejun Wen, Peng Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Peptides fromFuture microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xue GongLaboratory of Oral Biomedical Science and Translational Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Chao LinInstitute for Biomedical Engineering & Nano Science, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Jian ChengInstitute for Biomedical Engineering & Nano Science, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Jiansheng SuLaboratory of Oral Biomedical Science and Translational Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Hang ZhaoLaboratory of Oral Biomedical Science and Translational Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Tianlin LiuLaboratory of Oral Biomedical Science and Translational Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Xuejun WenInstitute for Biomedical Engineering & Nano Science, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China; Institute for Engineering and Medicine, Department of Chemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Peng ZhaoInstitute for Biomedical Engineering & Nano Science, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three dimensional multicellular aggregate, also referred to as cell spheroid or microtissue, is an indispensable tool for in vitro evaluating antitumor activity and drug efficacy. Compared with classical cellular monolayer, multicellular tumor spheroid (MCTS) offers a more rational platform to predict in vivo drug efficacy and toxicity. Nevertheless, traditional processing methods such as plastic dish culture with nonadhesive surfaces are regularly time-consuming, laborious and difficult to provide uniform-sized spheroids, thus causing poor reproducibility of experimental data and impeding high-throughput drug screening. In order to provide a robust and effective platform for in vitro drug evaluation, we present an agarose scaffold prepared with the template containing uniform-sized micro-wells in commercially available cell culture plates. The agarose scaffold allows for good adjustment of MCTS size and large-scale production of MCTS. Transparent agarose scaffold also allows for monitoring of spheroid formation under an optical microscopy. The formation of MCTS from MCF-7 cells was prepared using different-size-well templates and systematically investigated in terms of spheroid growth curve, circularity, and cell viability. The doxorubicin cytotoxicity against MCF-7 spheroid and MCF-7 monolayer cells was compared. The drug penetration behavior, cell cycle distribution, cell apoptosis, and gene expression were also evaluated in MCF-7 spheroid. The findings of this study indicate that, compared with cellular monolayer, MCTS provides a valuable platform for the assessment of therapeutic candidates in an in vivo-mimic microenvironment, and thus has great potential for use in drug discovery and tumor biology research.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDoxorubicinDrug DiscoveryDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Spheroids, CellularTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic AgentsDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID26090664
PMCPMC4474551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.