Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26090585›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2015

Coxsackievirus can exploit LC3 in both autophagy-dependent and -independent manners in vivo.

Mehrdad Alirezaei, Claudia T Flynn, Malcolm R Wood, Stephanie Harkins, J Lindsay Whitton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Host Subcellular Organelles: Targets of Viral Manipulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. The role of autophagy in viral infections.Journal of biomedical science · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The interplay of autophagy and enterovirus.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  20. Manipulation of autophagy by (+) RNA viruses.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehrdad Alirezaeia Department of Immunology and Microbial Science; The Scripps Research Institute ; La Jolla , CA USA.
Claudia T Flynn
Malcolm R Wood
Stephanie Harkins
J Lindsay Whitton
Scripps Research Institute · USLa Jolla Alcohol Research · US

Funding

Analyzing the effects of type I interferons in the enterovirus-infected heartR01AI110621 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WHITTON, J. LINDSAY · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Coxsackieviral pancreatitis: autophagy, proteolysis, and inflammationR01AI114615 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WHITTON, J. LINDSAY · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
How do enteroviruses almost completely evade the attentions of CD8+ T cells?R01AI103218 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WHITTON, J. LINDSAY · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS AI103218NIAID NIH HHS AI110621NIAID NIH HHS AI114615NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI103218NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110621NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA viruses modify intracellular membranes to produce replication scaffolds. In pancreatic cells, coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) hijacks membranes from the autophagy pathway, and in vivo disruption of acinar cell autophagy dramatically delays CVB3 replication. This is reversed by expression of GFP-LC3, indicating that CVB3 may acquire membranes from an alternative, autophagy-independent, source(s). Herein, using 3 recombinant CVB3s (rCVB3s) encoding different proteins (proLC3, proLC3(G120A), or ATG4B(C74A)), we show that CVB3 is, indeed, flexible in its utilization of cellular membranes. When compared with a control rCVB3, all 3 viruses replicated to high titers in vivo, and caused severe pancreatitis. Most importantly, each virus appeared to subvert membranes in a unique manner. The proLC3 virus produced a large quantity of LC3-I which binds to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), affording access to the autophagy pathway. The proLC3(G120A) protein cannot attach to PE, and instead binds to the ER-resident protein SEL1L, potentially providing an autophagy-independent source of membranes. Finally, the ATG4B(C74A) protein sequestered host cell LC3-I, causing accumulation of immature phagophores, and massive membrane rearrangement. Taken together, our data indicate that some RNA viruses can exploit a variety of different intracellular membranes, potentially maximizing their replication in each of the diverse cell types that they infect in vivo.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsAutophagy-Related ProteinsCoxsackievirus InfectionsCysteine EndopeptidasesEndoplasmic ReticulumEnterovirusGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHeLa CellsHomozygoteHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalAtg4b protein, mouseAutophagy-Related ProteinsCysteine EndopeptidasesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMap1lc3b protein, mouseMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsphosphatidylethanolaminePhosphatidylethanolaminesProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSel1h protein, mouseViral ProteinsautophagycoxsackievirusenterovirusERERADLC3membranespancreasRNA virusSEL1L

Identifiers

PMID26090585
PMCPMC4590631
OpenAlexW2144313657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.