ArticleBioMed research international2015
3D Bioprinting of Carboxymethylated-Periodate Oxidized Nanocellulose Constructs for Wound Dressing Applications.
Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 247 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in nanocellulose scaffold membranes: Sources, processing and functionalization.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Electrically conductive biopolymer-based hydrogels and fibrous materials fabricated using 3D printing and electrospinning for cardiac tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Development of Covalently Functionalized Alginate-Pyrrole and Polypyrrole-Alginate Nanocomposites as 3D Printable Electroconductive Bioinks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Lignocellulose Structures: Improving Mechanical Properties and Shape Fidelity.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Review
- Photocrosslinkable Cellulose Derivatives for the Manufacturing of All-Cellulose-Based Architectures.Polymers · 2023Article
- Rheology in Product Development: An Insight into 3D Printing of Hydrogels and Aerogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nanocellulose-based porous materials: Regulation and pathway to commercialization in regenerative medicine.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Printed Cellulose for Wound Dressing Applications.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Tunable poly(lauryl methacrylate) surface graftingRSC advances · 2023Article
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Techniques, Applications, and Future Directions for Cardiac Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Nanocomposite Bioprinting for Tissue Engineering Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sustainable Vegetable Oil-Based Biomaterials: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Gene-Expression Analysis of Human Fibroblasts Affected by 3D-Printed Carboxylated Nanocellulose Constructs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Research progress and challenges of bioprinting in wound dressing and healing: Bibliometrics-based analysis and perspectives.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
- Three-dimensional bioprinting of artificial blood vessel: Process, bioinks, and challenges.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
- Plant Polysaccharides in Engineered Pharmaceutical Gels.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Polysaccharide 3D Printing for Drug Delivery Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Modifications of cellulose-based biomaterials for biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanocellulose has a variety of advantages, which make the material most suitable for use in biomedical devices such as wound dressings. The material is strong, allows for production of transparent films, provides a moist wound healing environment, and can form elastic gels with bioresponsive characteristics. In this study, we explore the application of nanocellulose as a bioink for modifying film surfaces by a bioprinting process. Two different nanocelluloses were used, prepared with TEMPO mediated oxidation and a combination of carboxymethylation and periodate oxidation. The combination of carboxymethylation and periodate oxidation produced a homogeneous material with short nanofibrils, having widths <20 nm and lengths <200 nm. The small dimensions of the nanofibrils reduced the viscosity of the nanocellulose, thus yielding a material with good rheological properties for use as a bioink. The nanocellulose bioink was thus used for printing 3D porous structures, which is exemplified in this study. We also demonstrated that both nanocelluloses did not support bacterial growth, which is an interesting property of these novel materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.