ArticleFrontiers in oncology2015
Issues for Simulation of Galactic Cosmic Ray Exposures for Radiobiological Research at Ground-Based Accelerators.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of Cognitive Performance by Novel Object Recognition after Proton and Heavy Ion Exposures.Radiation research · 2019Pooled it
- cGAS/STING Pathway Mediates Accelerated Intestinal Cell Senescence and SASP After GCR Exposure in Mice.Cells · 2025Article
- Research on a General SER Rate Prediction Model Based on a Set of Configuration Parameters Related to SER.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Flying without a Net: Space Radiation Cancer Risk Predictions without a Gamma-ray Basis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Quantitative modeling of carcinogenesis induced by single beams or mixtures of space radiations using targeted and non-targeted effects.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Advances in space microbiology.iScience · 2021Review
- Dose-Effects Models for Space Radiobiology: An Overview on Dose-Effect Relationships.Frontiers in public health · 2021Review
- Evaluation of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors as Radiosensitizers for Proton and Light Ion Radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Contemporary biomedical engineering perspective on volitional evolution for human radiotolerance enhancement beyond low-earth orbit.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2021Review
- Review
- NASA's first ground-based Galactic Cosmic Ray Simulator: Enabling a new era in space radiobiology research.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Synergy theory for murine Harderian gland tumours after irradiation by mixtures of high-energy ionized atomic nuclei.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2019Article
- Central Nervous System Responses to Simulated Galactic Cosmic Rays.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Biophysics Model of Heavy-Ion Degradation of Neuron Morphology in Mouse Hippocampal Granular Cell Layer Neurons.Radiation research · 2018Article
- Whole-Body Exposure toRadiation research · 2017Article
- Article
- Galactic cosmic ray simulation at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory.Life sciences in space research · 2016Article
- Taking the 3Rs to a higher level: replacement and reduction of animal testing in life sciences in space research.Biotechnology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For radiobiology research on the health risks of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) ground-based accelerators have been used with mono-energetic beams of single high charge, Z and energy, E (HZE) particles. In this paper, we consider the pros and cons of a GCR reference field at a particle accelerator. At the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL), we have proposed a GCR simulator, which implements a new rapid switching mode and higher energy beam extraction to 1.5 GeV/u, in order to integrate multiple ions into a single simulation within hours or longer for chronic exposures. After considering the GCR environment and energy limitations of NSRL, we performed extensive simulation studies using the stochastic transport code, GERMcode (GCR Event Risk Model) to define a GCR reference field using 9 HZE particle beam-energy combinations each with a unique absorber thickness to provide fragmentation and 10 or more energies of proton and (4)He beams. The reference field is shown to well represent the charge dependence of GCR dose in several energy bins behind shielding compared to a simulated GCR environment. However, a more significant challenge for space radiobiology research is to consider chronic GCR exposure of up to 3 years in relation to simulations with animal models of human risks. We discuss issues in approaches to map important biological time scales in experimental models using ground-based simulation, with extended exposure of up to a few weeks using chronic or fractionation exposures. A kinetics model of HZE particle hit probabilities suggests that experimental simulations of several weeks will be needed to avoid high fluence rate artifacts, which places limitations on the experiments to be performed. Ultimately risk estimates are limited by theoretical understanding, and focus on improving knowledge of mechanisms and development of experimental models to improve this understanding should remain the highest priority for space radiobiology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.