ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2015
Developing a mesophilic co-culture for direct conversion of cellulose to butanol in consolidated bioprocess.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current progress on engineering microbial strains and consortia for production of cellulosic butanol through consolidated bioprocessing.Microbial biotechnology · 2023Review
- Construction of microbial consortia for microbial degradation of complex compounds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- New Insights into the Co-Occurrences of Glycoside Hydrolase Genes among Prokaryotic Genomes through Network Analysis.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- A bottom-up approach towards a bacterial consortium for the biotechnological conversion of chitin to L-lysine.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Developing Clostridia as Cell Factories for Short- and Medium-Chain Ester Production.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Advances and Applications ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Advances in the development and application of microbial consortia for metabolic engineering.Metabolic engineering communications · 2019Review
- Production of butanol from biomass: recent advances and future prospects.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Review
- Engineering microbial consortia by division of labor.Microbial cell factories · 2019Review
- Unique genetic cassettes in aScience advances · 2018Article
- Metabolic pairing of aerobic and anaerobic production in a one-pot batch cultivation.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2018Article
- Bacterial Synergism in Lignocellulose Biomass Degradation - Complementary Roles of Degraders As Influenced by Complexity of the Carbon Source.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Enhanced isopropanol and n-butanol production by supplying exogenous acetic acid via co-culturing two clostridium strains from cassava bagasse hydrolysate.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2016Article
- Design, analysis and application of synthetic microbial consortia.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of butanol production from cellulosic biomass is a promising strategy for cost saving compared to other processes featuring dedicated cellulase production. CBP requires microbial strains capable of hydrolyzing biomass with enzymes produced on its own with high rate and high conversion and simultaneously produce a desired product at high yield. However, current reported butanol-producing candidates are unable to utilize cellulose as a sole carbon source and energy source. Consequently, developing a co-culture system using different microorganisms by taking advantage of their specific metabolic capacities to produce butanol directly from cellulose in consolidated bioprocess is of great interest.
resultsThis study was mainly undertaken to find complementary organisms to the butanol producer that allow simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to butanol in their co-culture under mesophilic condition. Accordingly, a highly efficient and stable consortium N3 on cellulose degradation was first developed by multiple subcultures. Subsequently, the functional microorganisms with 16S rRNA sequences identical to the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profile were isolated from consortium N3. The isolate Clostridium celevecrescens N3-2 exhibited higher cellulose-degrading capability was thus chosen as the partner strain for butanol production with Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC824. Meanwhile, the established stable consortium N3 was also investigated to produce butanol by co-culturing with C. acetobutylicum ATCC824. Butanol was produced from cellulose when C. acetobutylicum ATCC824 was co-cultured with either consortium N3 or C. celevecrescens N3-2. Co-culturing C. acetobutylicum ATCC824 with the stable consortium N3 resulted in a relatively higher butanol concentration, 3.73 g/L, and higher production yield, 0.145 g/g of glucose equivalent.
conclusionsThe newly isolated microbial consortium N3 and strain C. celevecrescens N3-2 displayed effective degradation of cellulose and produced considerable amounts of butanol when they were co-cultured with C. acetobutylicum ATCC824. This is the first report of application of co-culture to produce butanol directly from cellulose under mesophilic condition. Our results indicated that co-culture of mesophilic cellulolytic microbe and butanol-producing clostridia provides a technically feasible and more simplified way for producing butanol directly from cellulose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.