Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089885›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of endocrinology2015

Quality of Care for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Dubai: A HEDIS-Like Assessment.

Shelagh M Szabo, Katherine M Osenenko, Lara Qatami, Bonnie M Korenblat Donato, Ellen E Korol, Abdulrazzaq A Al Madani, Fatheya F Al Awadi, Jaber Al-Ansari, Ross Maclean, Adrian R Levy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of endocrinology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Shelagh M SzaboICON Epidemiology, 450-688 W Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 1P1.
Katherine M OsenenkoICON Epidemiology, 450-688 W Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 1P1.
Lara QatamiBristol-Myers Squibb, P.O. Box 454409, Dubai, UAE.
Bonnie M Korenblat DonatoBristol-Myers Squibb, 5 Research Parkway, Wallingford, CT 06492, USA.
Ellen E KorolICON Epidemiology, 450-688 W Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 1P1.
Abdulrazzaq A Al MadaniDubai Hospital, Al Khaleeja Street, Al Baraha, Dubai, UAE.
Fatheya F Al AwadiDubai Hospital, Al Khaleeja Street, Al Baraha, Dubai, UAE.
Jaber Al-AnsariDubai Hospital, Al Khaleeja Street, Al Baraha, Dubai, UAE.
Ross MacleanPrecision Health Economics, 11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 500, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.
Adrian R LevyDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, 425-5790 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 1V7.
Dubai Hospital · AEBristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DEBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USDalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. As little data are available on the quality of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care in the Arabian Gulf States, we estimated the proportion of patients receiving recommended monitoring at the Dubai Hospital for T2DM over one year. Methods. Charts from 150 adults with T2DM were systematically sampled and quality of care was assessed during one calendar year, using a Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set- (HEDIS-) like assessment. Screening for glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), blood pressure, retinopathy, and nephropathy was considered. Patients were classified based on their most recent test in the period, and predictors of receiving quality care were examined. Results. Mean age was 58 years (standard deviation (SD): 12.4 years) and 33% were males. Over the year, 98% underwent HbA1c screening (50% had control and 28% displayed poor control); 91% underwent LDL screening (65% had control); 55% had blood pressure control; 30% had retinopathy screening; and 22% received attention for nephropathy. No individual characteristics examined predicted receiving quality care. Conclusion. Some guideline monitoring was conducted for most patients; and rates of monitoring for selected measures were comparable to benchmarks from the United States. Greater understanding of factors leading to high adherence would be useful for other areas of preventive care and other jurisdictions.

Identifiers

PMID26089885
PMCPMC4458297
OpenAlexW1572608926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.