Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089833›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2015

The Comet Assay and its applications in the field of ecotoxicology: a mature tool that continues to expand its perspectives.

Joaquín de Lapuente, Joana Lourenço, Sónia A Mendo, Miquel Borràs, Marta G Martins, Pedro M Costa, Mário Pacheco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Genotoxicity of Novel Pyrazolo[4,3-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Pyrazolo[4,3-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joaquín de LapuenteUnit of Experimental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (UTOX-CERETOX), Barcelona Science Park Barcelona, Spain.
Joana LourençoDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago . Aveiro, Portugal.
Sónia A MendoDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago . Aveiro, Portugal.
Miquel BorràsUnit of Experimental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (UTOX-CERETOX), Barcelona Science Park Barcelona, Spain.
Marta G MartinsDepartamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal.
Pedro M CostaDepartamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal.
Mário PachecoDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago . Aveiro, Portugal.
University of Aveiro · PTBarcelona Biomedical Research Park · ESUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since Singh and colleagues, in 1988, launched to the scientific community the alkaline Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis (SCGE) protocol, or Comet Assay, its uses and applications has been increasing. The thematic areas of its current employment in the evaluation of genetic toxicity are vast, either in vitro or in vivo, both in the laboratory and in the environment, terrestrial or aquatic. It has been applied to a wide range of experimental models: bacteria, fungi, cells culture, arthropods, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and humans. This document is intended to be a comprehensive review of what has been published to date on the field of ecotoxicology, aiming at the following main aspects: (i) to show the most relevant experimental models used as bioindicators both in the laboratory and in the field. Fishes are clearly the most adopted group, reflecting their popularity as bioindicator models, as well as a primary concern over the aquatic environment health. Amphibians are among the most sensitive organisms to environmental changes, mainly due to an early aquatic-dependent development stage and a highly permeable skin. Moreover, in the terrestrial approach, earthworms, plants or mammalians are excellent organisms to be used as experimental models for genotoxic evaluation of pollutants, complex mix of pollutants and chemicals, in both laboratory and natural environment. (ii) To review the development and modifications of the protocols used and the cell types (or tissues) used. The most recent developments concern the adoption of the enzyme linked assay (digestion with lesion-specific repair endonucleases) and prediction of the ability to repair of oxidative DNA damage, which is becoming a widespread approach, albeit challenging. For practical/technical reasons, blood is the most common choice but tissues/cells like gills, sperm cells, early larval stages, coelomocytes, liver or kidney have been also used. (iii) To highlight correlations with other biomarkers. (iv) To build a constructive criticism and summarize the needs for protocol improvements for future test applications within the field of ecotoxicology. The Comet Assay is still developing and its potential is yet underexploited in experimental models, mesocosmos or natural ecosystems.

Indexed as

amphibiansComet Assayearthwormsecotoxicologymolluskspiscine modelplants

Identifiers

PMID26089833
PMCPMC4454841
OpenAlexW1529629042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.