Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089819›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Automatic day-2 intervention by a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship-team leads to multiple positive effects.

Jan-Willem H Dik, Ron Hendrix, Jerome R Lo-Ten-Foe, Kasper R Wilting, Prashant N Panday, Lisette E van Gemert-Pijnen, Annemarie M Leliveld, Job van der Palen, Alex W Friedrich, Bhanu Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jan-Willem H DikDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Ron HendrixDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands ; Certe Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Groningen, Netherlands.
Jerome R Lo-Ten-FoeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Kasper R WiltingDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Prashant N PandayDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Lisette E van Gemert-PijnenDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente Enschede, Netherlands.
Annemarie M LeliveldDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Job van der PalenDepartment of Research Methodology, Measurement and Data Analysis, University of Twente Enschede, Netherlands ; Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede, Netherlands.
Alex W FriedrichDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Bhanu SinhaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance rates are increasing. This is, among others, caused by incorrect or inappropriate use of antimicrobials. To target this, a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship-team (A-Team) was implemented at the University Medical Center Groningen on a urology ward. Goal of this study is to evaluate the clinical effects of the case-audits done by this team, looking at length of stay (LOS) and antimicrobial use.

methodsAutomatic e-mail alerts were sent after 48 h of consecutive antimicrobial use triggering the case-audits, consisting of an A-Team member visiting the ward, discussing the patient's therapy with the bed-side physician and together deciding on further treatment based on available diagnostics and guidelines. Clinical effects of the audits were evaluated through an Interrupted Time Series analysis and a retrospective historic cohort.

resultsA significant systemic reduction of antimicrobial consumption for all patients on the ward, both with and without case-audits was observed. Furthermore, LOS for patients with case-audits who were admitted primarily due to infections decreased to 6.20 days (95% CI: 5.59-6.81) compared to the historic cohort (7.57 days; 95% CI: 6.92-8.21; p = 0.012). Antimicrobial consumption decreased for these patients from 8.17 DDD/patient (95% CI: 7.10-9.24) to 5.93 DDD/patient (95% CI: 5.02-6.83; p = 0.008). For patients with severe underlying diseases (e.g., cancer) these outcome measures remained unchanged.

conclusionThe evaluation showed a considerable positive impact. Antibiotic use of the whole ward was reduced, transcending the intervened patients. Furthermore, LOS and mean antimicrobial consumption for a subgroup was reduced, thereby improving patient care and potentially lowering resistance rates.

Indexed as

antimicrobial prescriptionantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipA-Teamsintervention study

Identifiers

PMID26089819
PMCPMC4452884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.