Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089816›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Microbial responses to changes in flow status in temporary headwater streams: a cross-system comparison.

Catherine M Febria, Jacob D Hosen, Byron C Crump, Margaret A Palmer, D Dudley Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structure, Diversity, and Metabolic Potential of Bacterioplankton in an Urban River at a Long Low-Level Water Period.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of the Impacts of Abandoned Mining Areas: A Case Study with Benthic Macroinvertebrate Assemblages.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine M FebriaDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland College Park, MD, USA ; Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Solomons, MD, USA ; School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand.
Jacob D HosenDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland College Park, MD, USA ; Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Solomons, MD, USA.
Byron C CrumpCollege of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA.
Margaret A PalmerDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland College Park, MD, USA ; Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Solomons, MD, USA ; National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, University of Maryland College Park, MD, USA.
D Dudley WilliamsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough Scarborough, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities are responsible for the bulk of biogeochemical processing in temporary headwater streams, yet there is still relatively little known about how community structure and function respond to periodic drying. Moreover, the ability to sample temporary habitats can be a logistical challenge due to the limited capability to measure and predict the timing, intensity and frequency of wet-dry events. Unsurprisingly, published datasets on microbial community structure and function are limited in scope and temporal resolution and vary widely in the molecular methods applied. We compared environmental and microbial community datasets for permanent and temporary tributaries of two different North American headwater stream systems: Speed River (Ontario, Canada) and Parkers Creek (Maryland, USA). We explored whether taxonomic diversity and community composition were altered as a result of flow permanence and compared community composition amongst streams using different 16S microbial community methods (i.e., T-RFLP and Illumina MiSeq). Contrary to our hypotheses, and irrespective of method, community composition did not respond strongly to drying. In both systems, community composition was related to site rather than drying condition. Additional network analysis on the Parkers Creek dataset indicated a shift in the central microbial relationships between temporary and permanent streams. In the permanent stream at Parkers Creek, associations of methanotrophic taxa were most dominant, whereas associations with taxa from the order Nitrospirales were more dominant in the temporary stream, particularly during dry conditions. We compared these results with existing published studies from around the world and found a wide range in community responses to drying. We conclude by proposing three hypotheses that may address contradictory results and, when tested across systems, may expand understanding of the responses of microbial communities in temporary streams to natural and human-induced fluctuations in flow-status and permanence.

Indexed as

bacterial diversitymicrobial ecologyoperational taxonomic unit (OTU)temporary streams

Identifiers

PMID26089816
PMCPMC4454877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.