ArticleClinical ethics2015
Responsible research and innovation: A manifesto for empirical ethics?
Article in Clinical ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in youth mental health: reflections from researchers and young people.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- East Asian perspective of responsible research and innovation in neurotechnology.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- DBS: a compelling example for ethical and legal reflection-a French perspective on ethical and legal concerns about DBS.Monash bioethics review · 2020Article
- Patient's lived experience with DBS between medical research and care: some legal implications.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019Article
- Self-tests for influenza: an empirical ethics investigation.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- Securing a future for responsible neuromodulation in children: The importance of maintaining a broad clinical gaze.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2017Review
- Towards a phronetic space for responsible research (and innovation).Life sciences, society and policy · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2013 the Nuffield Council on Bioethics launched their report
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.