Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089302›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2015

Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men.

C N Jayasena, A Abbara, S Narayanaswamy, A N Comninos, R Ratnasabapathy, P Bassett, J T Mogford, Z Malik, J Calley, M A Ghatei and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pubertal development and regulation.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C N JayasenaDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
A AbbaraDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
S NarayanaswamyDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
A N ComninosDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
R RatnasabapathyDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
P BassettStatsconsultancy Ltd, 40 Longwood Lane, Amersham, Bucks HP7 9EN, UK.
J T MogfordDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
Z MalikDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
J CalleyDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
M A GhateiDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
S R BloomDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK.
W S DhilloDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, 6th Floor, Commonwealth Building, London W12 0NN, UK w.dhillo@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBHammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2009-02-05Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionHow potently does the novel hypothalamic stimulator of reproduction, kisspeptin, increase gonadotrophin secretion when compared with GnRH in healthy men? SUMMARY ANSWER: At the doses tested, intravenous administration of either of two major kisspeptin isoforms, kisspeptin-10 and -54, was associated with similar levels of gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men; however, GnRH was more potent when compared with either kisspeptin isoform. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Kisspeptin-10 and -54 are naturally occurring hormones in the kisspeptin peptide family which potently stimulates endogenous GnRH secretion from the hypothalamus, so have the potential to treat patients with reproductive disorders. Rodent studies suggest that kisspeptin-54 is more potent when compared with kisspepitn-10; however, their effects have not previously been directly compared in humans, or compared with direct pituitary stimulation of gonadotrophin secretion using GnRH. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: A single-blinded placebo controlled physiological study was performed from January to December 2013. Local ethical approval was granted, and five participants were recruited to each dosing group. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsHealthy men were administered vehicle, kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH intravenously for 3 h on different study days. Each hormone was administered at 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 nmol/kg/h doses (n = 5 subjects per group). Regular blood sampling was conducted throughout the study to measure LH and FSH. Study visits were conducted at least a week apart. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Serum LH and FSH levels were ∼3-fold higher during GnRH infusion when compared with kisspeptin-10 and ∼2-fold higher when compared with kisspeptin-54 [mean area under the curve serum LH during infusion (in hours times international units per litre, h.IU/l): 10.81 ± 1.73, 1.0 nmol/kg/h kisspeptin-10; 14.43 ± 1.27, 1.0 nmol/kg/h kisspeptin-54; 34.06 ± 5.18, 1.0 nmol/kg/h GnRH, P < 0.001 versus kisspeptin-10, P < 0.01 versus kisspeptin-54]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study had a small sample size. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsKisspeptin offers a novel means of stimulating the reproductive axis. Our data suggest that kisspeptin stimulates gonadotrophin secretion less potently when compared with GnRH; however, kisspeptin may stimulate gonadotrophins in a more physiological manner when compared with current therapies. Kisspeptin is emerging as a future therapeutic agent, so it is important to establish which kisspeptin hormones could be used to treat patients with infertility. Results of this study suggest that either isoform has similar effects on reproductive hormone secretion in healthy men when administered intravenously. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work is funded by grants from the MRC and NIHR and is supported by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme. C.N.J. is supported by an NIHR Clinical Lectureship. A.A. is supported by Wellcome Trust Research Training Fellowships. A.N.C. is supported by Wellcome Trust Translational Medicine Training Fellowship. W.S.D. is supported by an NIHR Career Development Fellowship.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultFollicle Stimulating HormoneGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansKisspeptinsLuteinizing HormoneMaleSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultFollicle Stimulating HormoneGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneKISS1 protein, humanKisspeptinsLuteinizing HormoneFSHGnRHkisspeptin-10kisspeptin-54LH

Identifiers

PMID26089302
PMCPMC4507333
OpenAlexW2195338808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.