Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089248›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2015

Cell segregation in the vertebrate hindbrain: a matter of boundaries.

Javier Terriente, Cristina Pujades

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hindbrain induction and patterning during early vertebrate development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  2. Evolutionary emergence of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Visualizing retinoic acid morphogen gradients.Methods in cell biology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Javier TerrienteDepartment of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, PRBB, Dr Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. javier.terriente@upf.edu.
Cristina PujadesDepartment of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, PRBB, Dr Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. cristina.pujades@upf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6423-7451
Universitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segregating cells into compartments during embryonic development is essential for growth and pattern formation. In the developing hindbrain, boundaries separate molecularly, physically and neuroanatomically distinct segments called rhombomeres. After rhombomeric cells have acquired their identity, interhombomeric boundaries restrict cell intermingling between adjacent rhombomeres and act as signaling centers to pattern the surrounding tissue. Several works have stressed the relevance of Eph/ephrin signaling in rhombomeric cell sorting. Recent data have unveiled the role of this pathway in the assembly of actomyosin cables as an important mechanism for keeping cells from different rhombomeres segregated. In this Review, we will provide a short summary of recent evidences gathered in different systems suggesting that physical actomyosin barriers can be a general mechanism for tissue separation. We will discuss current evidences supporting a model where cell-cell signaling pathways, such as Eph/ephrin, govern compartmental cell sorting through modulation of the actomyosin cytoskeleton and cell adhesive properties to prevent cell intermingling.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalActomyosinAnimalsCell AdhesionCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell MovementHumansMorphogenesisRhombencephalonSpecies SpecificityActomyosinBoundariesCell segregationCell sortingCompartmentsHindbrain segmentationTissue separation

Identifiers

PMID26089248
PMCPMC11113478
OpenAlexW574559075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.