Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089166›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2016

Clinical practice in perioperative monitoring in adult cardiac surgery: is there a standard of care? Results from an national survey.

Elena Bignami, Alessandro Belletti, Paola Moliterni, Elena Frati, Marcello Guarnieri, Luigi Tritapepe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena BignamiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. bignami.elena@hsr.it.
Alessandro BellettiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Paola MoliterniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, University of Milan, Via Carlo Parea 4, 20138, Milan, Italy.
Elena FratiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Marcello GuarnieriDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Luigi TritapepeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Rome, "La Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
San Raffaele University of Rome · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was to investigate and define what is considered as a current clinical practice in hemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive medication use after cardiac surgery in Italy. A 33-item questionnaire was sent to all intensive care units (ICUs) admitting patients after cardiac surgery. 71 out of 92 identified centers (77.2 %) returned a completed questionnaire. Electrocardiogram, invasive blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulse oximetry, diuresis, body temperature and blood gas analysis were identified as routinely used hemodynamic monitoring, whereas advanced monitoring was performed with pulmonary artery catheter or echocardiography. Crystalloids were the fluids of choice for volume replacement (86.8 % of Centers). To guide volume management, central venous pressure (26.7 %) and invasive blood pressure (19.7 %) were the most frequently used parameters. Dobutamine was the first choice for treatment of left heart dysfunction (40 %) and epinephrine was the first choice for right heart dysfunction (26.8 %). Half of the Centers had an internal protocol for vasoactive drugs administration. Intra-aortic balloon pump and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation were widely available among Cardiothoracic ICUs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were suspended in 28 % of the Centers. The survey shows what is considered as standard monitoring in Italian Cardiac ICUs. Standard, routinely used monitoring consists of ECG, SpO2, etCO2, invasive BP, CVP, diuresis, body temperature, and BGA. It also shows that there is large variability among the various Centers regarding hemodynamic monitoring of fluid therapy and inotropes administration. Further research is required to better standardize and define the indicators to improve the standards of intensive care after cardiac surgery among Italian cardiac ICUs.

Indexed as

AdultAssisted CirculationBlood TransfusionCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiotonic AgentsFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansIntensive Care UnitsItalyMonitoring, IntraoperativeStandard of CareSurveys and QuestionnairesVasoconstrictor AgentsCardiotonic AgentsVasoconstrictor AgentsCardiac surgeryGoal-directed therapyHemodynamic monitoringInotropic drugsIntensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID26089166
OpenAlexW588492103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.