Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089095›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2015

Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time.

Sheng Zhang, Shang-Jui Tsai, Sien Hu, Jiansong Xu, Herta H Chao, Vince D Calhoun, Chiang-Shan R Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Long-TermFrontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Activity and Connectivity Differences Underlying Inhibitory Control Across the Adult Life Span.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sheng ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Shang-Jui TsaiDepartment of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sien HuDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jiansong XuDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Herta H ChaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Vince D CalhounDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Chiang-Shan R LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI SUI, JING · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Cognitive control and cocaine dependence: thalamic noradrenergic processesR01DA023248 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHIANG-SHAN RAY · 2008 to 2018
$4.0M
Cerebral Correlates of Early Habitual DrinkingR01AA021449 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHIANG-SHAN RAY · 2013 to 2017
$1.2M
Imaging Cognitive Control in Cocaine DependenceK02DA026990 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHIANG-SHAN RAY · 2009 to 2013
$639k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA021449NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021449NIDA NIH HHS DA023248NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA026990NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023248NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control is a critical executive function. Many studies have combined general linear modeling and the stop signal task (SST) to delineate the component processes of cognitive control. For instance, by contrasting stop success (SS) and stop error (SE) trials in the SST, investigators examined regional responses to stop signal inhibition. In contrast to this parameterized approach, independent component analysis (ICA) elucidates brain networks subserving cognitive control. In our earlier work of 59 adults performing the SST during fMRI, we characterized six independent components (ICs). However, none of these ICs correlated with stop signal performance, raising questions about their behavioral validity. Here, in a larger sample (n = 100), we identified and explored 23 ICs for correlation with the stop signal reaction time (SSRT), a measure of the efficiency of response inhibition. At a corrected threshold (P < 0.0005), a paracentral lobule-midcingulate network and a left inferior parietal-supplementary motor-somatomotor network showed a positive correlation between SE beta weight and SSRT. In contrast, a midline cerebellum-thalamus-pallidum network showed a negative correlation between SE beta weight and SSRT. These findings suggest that motor preparation and execution prolongs the SSRT, likely via an interaction between the go and stop processes as suggested by the race model. Behaviorally, consistent with this hypothesis, the difference in G and SE reaction times is positively correlated with SSRT across subjects. These new results highlight the importance of cognitive motor regions in response inhibition and support the utility of ICA in uncovering functional networks for cognitive control in the SST.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultAgedBrainBrain MappingData Interpretation, StatisticalExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimefMRIICAinhibitory controlneural networkneuroimagingnogostop signal

Identifiers

PMID26089095
PMCPMC4545723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.