Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089043›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2016

Reliability and Validity of Objective Measures of Physical Activity in Youth With Cerebral Palsy Who Are Ambulatory.

Margaret E O'Neil, Maria Fragala-Pinkham, Nancy Lennon, Ameeka George, Jeffrey Forman, Stewart G Trost

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Validity of PROMISBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Physical Activity and Public Health among People with Disabilities: Research Gaps and Recommendations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret E O'NeilM.E. O'Neil, PT, PhD, MPH, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Drexel University, 1601 Cherry St, Mail Stop 7502, Philadelphia, PA 19102 (USA). moneil@drexel.edu.
Maria Fragala-PinkhamM. Fragala-Pinkham, PT, DPT, MS, Research Center, Franciscan Hospital for Children, Brighton, Massachusetts.
Nancy LennonN. Lennon, MS, PT, Gait Analysis Laboratory, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware.
Ameeka GeorgeA. George, BS, Gait Analysis Laboratory, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children.
Jeffrey FormanJ. Forman, MD, Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Franciscan Hospital for Children.
Stewart G TrostS.G. Trost, PhD, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children · USFranciscan Hospital for Children · USDrexel University · USQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical therapy for youth with cerebral palsy (CP) who are ambulatory includes interventions to increase functional mobility and participation in physical activity (PA). Thus, reliable and valid measures are needed to document PA in youth with CP.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-instrument reliability and concurrent validity of 3 accelerometer-based motion sensors with indirect calorimetry as the criterion for measuring PA intensity in youth with CP.

methodsFifty-seven youth with CP (mean age=12.5 years, SD=3.3; 51% female; 49.1% with spastic hemiplegia) participated. Inclusion criteria were: aged 6 to 20 years, ambulatory, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I through III, able to follow directions, and able to complete the full PA protocol. Protocol activities included standardized activity trials with increasing PA intensity (resting, writing, household chores, active video games, and walking at 3 self-selected speeds), as measured by weight-relative oxygen uptake (in mL/kg/min). During each trial, participants wore bilateral accelerometers on the upper arms, waist/hip, and ankle and a portable indirect calorimeter. Intraclass coefficient correlations (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate inter-instrument reliability (left-to-right accelerometer placement). Spearman correlations were used to examine concurrent validity between accelerometer output (activity and step counts) and indirect calorimetry. Friedman analyses of variance with post hoc pair-wise analyses were conducted to examine the validity of accelerometers to discriminate PA intensity across activity trials.

resultsAll accelerometers exhibited excellent inter-instrument reliability (ICC=.94-.99) and good concurrent validity (rho=.70-.85). All accelerometers discriminated PA intensity across most activity trials. LIMITATIONS: This PA protocol consisted of controlled activity trials.

conclusionsAccelerometers provide valid and reliable measures of PA intensity among youth with CP.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAccelerometryActivities of Daily LivingAdolescentCerebral PalsyChildFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26089043
PMCPMC4706594
OpenAlexW2201795323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.