Observational studyHaematologica2015
Predictive models for ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease diagnosis and disease activity in transplant clinical practice.
Observational study in Haematologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ocular graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation: Expert review from the Late Effects and Quality of Life Working Committee of the CIBMTR and Transplant Complications Working Party of the EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019Pooled it
- Long-term safety and efficacy of autologous platelet lysate drops for treatment of ocular GvHD.Bone marrow transplantation · 2017Trial
- How does ocular graft-versus-host disease fit under the dry eye umbrella? A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Development and validation of a diagnostic model for the identification of chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD).Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Ocular surface disease index questionnaire as a sensitive test for primary screening of chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IIa. The 2020 Clinical Implementation and Early Diagnosis Working Group Report.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2021Article
- Efficacy and retention of silicone punctal plugs for treatment of dry eye in patients with and without ocular graft-versus-host-disease.The ocular surface · 2020Article
- Ocular Graft-versus-Host Disease after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Expert Review from the Late Effects and Quality of Life Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and Transplant Complications Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019Review
- Corneal features in ocular graft-versus-host disease by in vivo confocal microscopy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017Article
- Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease is one of the most bothersome common complications following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Consensus Project provided expert recommendations for diagnosis and organ severity scoring. However, ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease can be diagnosed only after examination by an ophthalmologist. There are no currently accepted definitions of ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease activity. The goal of this study was to identify predictive models of diagnosis and activity for use in clinical transplant practice. A total of 210 patients with moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease were enrolled in a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00092235). Experienced ophthalmologists determined presence of ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease, diagnosis and activity. Measures gathered by the transplant clinician included Schirmer's tear test and National Institutes of Health 0-3 Eye Score. Patient-reported outcome measures were the ocular subscale of the Lee Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Symptom Scale and Chief Eye Symptom Intensity Score. Altogether, 157 (75%) patients were diagnosed with ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease; 133 of 157 patients (85%) had active disease. In a multivariable model, the National Institutes of Health Eye Score (P<0.0001) and Schirmer's tear test (P<0.0001) were independent predictors of ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (sensitivity 93.0%, specificity 92.2%). The Lee ocular subscale was the strongest predictor of active ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (P<0.0001) (sensitivity 68.5%, specificity 82.6%). Ophthalmology specialist measures that were most strongly predictive of diagnosis in a multivariate model were Oxford grand total staining (P<0.0001) and meibomian score (P=0.027). These results support the use of selected transplant clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures for ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease screening when providing care to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survivors with moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease. Prospective studies are needed to determine if the Lee ocular subscale demonstrates adequate responsiveness as a disease activity outcome measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.