Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088931›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2015

Efficacy of immune suppression tapering in treating relapse after reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Natasha Kekre, Haesook T Kim, Gita Thanarajasingam, Philippe Armand, Joseph H Antin, Corey Cutler, Sarah Nikiforow, Vincent T Ho, John Koreth, Edwin P Alyea and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Graft-Versus-Host Disease Mouse Models: A Clinical-Translational Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha KekreDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Haesook T KimDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Gita ThanarajasingamDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Philippe ArmandDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Joseph H AntinDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Corey CutlerDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah NikiforowDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Vincent T HoDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
John KorethDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Edwin P AlyeaDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert J SoifferDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA rsoiffer@partners.org.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Manipulation of Immune Responsiveness after Hematopoietic Cell TransplantationR01CA183559 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI RITZ, JEROME, SOIFFER, ROBERT JON · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation while still on immune suppression, there is anecdotal evidence that tapering the immune suppression may result in graft-versus-tumor activity. We reviewed the medical records of all patients with documented histological or radiographic disease recurrence within 1 year of stem cell transplantation while on immune suppression at our institution. The median time to relapse was 110 days (range, 18-311) after transplant. Among 123 patients with relapse treated with immune suppression tapering without chemotherapy, radiation, or donor lymphocyte infusion, 34 responded (33/101 reduced intensity conditioning transplant and 1/22 myeloablative conditioning transplant, 32.7% and 4.5% respectively; P=0.007). The median time to response after initiation of immune suppression tapering was 82 days (range, 16-189). Thirty-three patients (97.1%) had development or progression of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease as a consequence of immune suppression tapering, at a median time of 39 days (range, 16-98). Six patients subsequently relapsed late after initial response to immune suppression tapering at a median time of 2 years (range, 0.9-3.8). The median overall survival from immune suppression tapering for responders was 5.1 years (range, 1.9-not estimable). When clinically feasible, immune suppression tapering alone in patients who relapse early after reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation can produce durable remissions, but is almost always associated with graft-versus-host disease.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationImmunosuppression TherapyAdultAgedAllograftsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID26088931
PMCPMC4800679
OpenAlexW2173773534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.