Fluid resuscitation of shock in children: what, whence and whither?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial.Archives of disease in childhood · 2019
   Trial
2. Early inotropic support without fluid bolusWorld journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026
   Article
3. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
   Review
4. Salivary biomarkers may measure stress responses in critically ill children.SAGE open medicine · 2018
   Article
5. The intensive care medicine clinical research agenda in paediatrics.Intensive care medicine · 2017
   Review
6. Focus on paediatrics.Intensive care medicine · 2016
   Article
7. Timing of antibiotics, volume, and vasoactive infusions in children with sepsis admitted to intensive care.Critical care (London, England) · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Early fluid accumulation in children with shock and ICU mortality: a matched case-control study.2015

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as