Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088854›Full record

Trial reportCroatian medical journal2015

Intraoperative volume restriction in esophageal cancer surgery: an exploratory randomized clinical trial.

Maja Karaman Ilić, Goran Madžarac, Jana Kogler, Dinko Stančić-Rokotov, Nevenka Hodoba

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Croatian medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Methodological Errors in Clinical Studies Published by Medical Journals of Ex-Yugoslav Countries.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maja Karaman IlićMaja Karaman Ilić, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Anesthesiology, Jordanovac 104, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia, majakilic1@gmail.com.
Goran Madžarac
Jana Kogler
Dinko Stančić-Rokotov
Nevenka Hodoba
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate whether the fluid volume administered during esophageal cancer surgery affects pulmonary gas exchange and tissue perfusion.

methodsAn exploratory single-center randomized clinical trial was performed. Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent Lewis-Tanner procedure between June 2011 and August 2012 at the Department of Thoracic surgery "Jordanovac", Zagreb were analyzed. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive a restrictive volume of intraoperative fluid (≤8 mL/kg/h) or a liberal volume (>8 mL/kg/h). Changes in oxygen partial pressure (Pao2), inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2), creatinine, and lactate were measured during and after surgery.

resultsOverall 16 patients were randomized and they all were analyzed (restrictive group n=8, liberal group n=8). The baseline value Pao2/FiO2 ratio (restrictive) was 345.01±35.31 and the value six hours after extubation was 315.51±32.91; the baseline Pao2/FiO2 ratio (liberal) was 330.11±34.71 and the value six hours after extubation was 307.11±30.31. The baseline creatinine value (restrictive) was 91.91±12.67 and the value six hours after extubation was 100.88±18.33; the baseline creatinine value (liberal) was 90.88±14.99 and the value six hours after extubation was 93.51±16.37. The baseline lactate value (restrictive) was 3.93±1.33 and the value six hours after extubation was 2.69±0.91. The baseline lactate value (liberal) was 3.26±1.25 and the value six hours after extubation was 2.40±1.08. The two groups showed no significant differences in Pao2/FiO2 ratio (P=0.410), creatinine (P=0.410), or lactate (P=0.574).

conclusionsRestriction of intraoperative applied volume does not significantly affect pulmonary exchange function or tissue perfusion in patients undergoing surgical treatment for esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Gas AnalysisEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleFluid TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPulmonary Gas Exchange

Identifiers

PMID26088854
PMCPMC4500974
OpenAlexW2335437536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.