Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088726›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

The limits of chemosensation vary across dimensions.

Brendan A Bicknell, Peter Dayan, Geoffrey J Goodhill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ChemotaxingArXiv · 2025
    Article
  2. ChemotaxingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Origins of eukaryotic excitability.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brendan A Bicknell1] Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia [2] School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Peter DayanGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.ORCID 0000000334761839
Geoffrey J Goodhill1] Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia [2] School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many biological processes rely on the ability of cells to measure local ligand concentration. However, such measurements are constrained by noise arising from diffusion and the stochastic nature of receptor-ligand interactions. It is thus critical to understand how accurately, in principle, concentration measurements can be made. Previous theoretical work has mostly investigated this in 3D under the simplifying assumption of an unbounded domain of diffusion, but many biological problems involve 2D concentration measurement in bounded domains, for which diffusion behaves quite differently. Here we present a theory of the precision of chemosensation that covers bounded domains of any dimensionality. We find that the quality of chemosensation in lower dimensions is controlled by domain size, suggesting a general principle applicable to many biological systems. Applying the theory to biological problems in 2D shows that diffusion-limited signalling is an efficient mechanism on time scales consistent with behaviour.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalChemoreceptor CellsDiffusionSensation

Identifiers

PMID26088726
PMCPMC4557358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.