ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2015
The aetiology of schizophrenia: what have the Swedish Medical Registers taught us?
Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Astrocytes in the Molecular Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia: Between Neurodevelopment and Neurodegeneration.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Neurodevelopmental disturbances in schizophrenia: evidence from genetic and environmental factors.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2023Review
- Relationship betweenIranian journal of public health · 2021Article
- Conditions Associated with Essential Tremor in Veterans: A Potential Role for Chronic Stress.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- 'Big data' in mental health research: current status and emerging possibilities.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2016Review
- Novel methods in psychiatric epidemiology.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2016Article
- Early Life Bereavement and Schizophrenia: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark and Sweden.Medicine · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review the last thirty years of studies that, using Swedish population registers, have added to our understanding of the aetiology of schizophrenia SAMPLE INCLUDED/
methodsA literature search was performed to systematically review all studies that using Swedish Population based registers have investigated the aetiology of schizophrenia. Key authors in the field, predominately from Swedish institutions, were additionally contacted and key journals hand searched, for missing references. A quality assessment methodological review was then conducted on each study. Data was extracted and tabulated on identified aetiological themes
results61 articles were included corresponding to 10 identified aetiological themes. Although the majority of included studies were retrospective cohort studies, case control studies were also included where they used population based registers. Confirming previous research, schizophrenia was found to have a multi-factorial aetiological basis with pregnancy and birth factors, parental age, social adversity, genetics, substance misuse, migration and ethnicity, personality, non-psychiatric co-morbidity, psychiatric history and poor cognitive performance all found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of later schizophrenia.
conclusionsAlthough some difficulties exist in analysing the interplay between each of these factors, the Swedish population registers have added considerably to our understanding of each of the presented individual aetiological themes. The ability to study the whole population over several decades has been particularly useful in determining the timing of exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.