Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088469›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2015

Postmortem-computed tomography and postmortem-computed tomography-angiography: a focused update.

Francesco Paolo Busardò, Paola Frati, Giuseppe Guglielmi, Giampaolo Grilli, Antonio Pinto, Antonio Rotondo, Valeria Panebianco, Vittorio Fineschi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. State of the art in post-mortem computed tomography: a review of current literature.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bony injuries in homicide cases (1994-2014). A retrospective study.International journal of legal medicine · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco Paolo BusardòDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Paola Frati
Giuseppe Guglielmi
Giampaolo Grilli
Antonio Pinto
Antonio Rotondo
Valeria Panebianco
Vittorio Fineschi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of multidetector CT (MDCT) represents a reality routinely used in several forensic institutes, for the numerous advantages that this diagnostic tool can provide; costs are becoming increasingly lower; data acquisition is always faster and once acquired may be revalued at any time. However, there are also some diagnostic limitations, for example, the visualization of the vascular system or a limited soft tissue contrast. In order to overcome these limitations, in recent years, contrast medium has been introduced in postmortem cases, with the development of several techniques of PMCT angiography (PMCTA) and standardized protocols to make them easily reproducible. The aim of this review is to highlight the advantages and pitfalls of PMCT and PMCTA in forensic investigation, taking into consideration the broad spectrum of applications both for natural and unnatural deaths and the numerous methods currently used. Secondly, in the light of the considerable progress in this field and the attempt to develop standardized protocols of PMCTA, the authors aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of PMCTA in comparison both to PMCT and conventional autopsy.

Indexed as

AngiographyAutopsyCause of DeathForensic MedicineHumansPostmortem ChangesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.