Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088379›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular computed tomography

Viability assessment after conventional coronary angiography using a novel cardiovascular interventional therapeutic CT system: Comparison with gross morphology in a subacute infarct swine model.

Yeonggul Jang, Iksung Cho, Bríain W Ó Hartaigh, Se-Il Park, Youngtaek Hong, Sanghoon Shin, Seongmin Ha, Byunghwan Jeon, Hoyup Jung, Hackjoon Shim and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Establishment and Simulation of 3D Geometric Models of Mini-Pig and Sheep Knee Joints Using Finite Element Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yeonggul Jang *Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Iksung Cho *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemungu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Bríain W Ó HartaighDepartment of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and the Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Se-Il ParkCardiovascular Product Evaluation Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Youngtaek HongBrain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Sanghoon ShinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemungu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Seongmin HaBrain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Byunghwan JeonBrain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Hoyup JungDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Kyonggi, 449-791, Korea.
Hackjoon ShimCardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
James K MinDepartment of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and the Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Hyuk-Jae ChangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemungu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Yangsoo JangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemungu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Namsik ChungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemungu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Yonsei University · KRCornell University · USHankuk University of Foreign Studies · KRNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
Gender-Specific Coronary Plaque Characteristics and Risk of Myocardial InfarctionR01HL115150 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MIN, JAMES K · 2012 to 2016
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the lack of promptness and inevitable use of additional contrast agents, the myocardial viability imaging procedures have not been used widely for determining the need to performing revascularization.

objectiveThis study is aimed to evaluate the feasibility of myocardial viability assessment, consecutively with diagnostic invasive coronary angiography (ICA) without use of additional contrast agent, using a novel hybrid system comprising ICA and multislice CT (MSCT).

methodsIn all, 14 Yucatan miniature swine models (female; age, 3 months; weight, 28-30 kg) were subjected to ICA followed by balloon occlusion (90 minutes) and reperfusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Two weeks after induction of myocardial infarction, delayed hyperenhancement (DHE) images were obtained, using a novel combined machine comprising ICA and 320-channel MSCT scanner (Aquilion ONE, Toshiba), after 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after conventional ICA. The heart was sliced in 10-mm consecutive sections in the short-axis plane and was embedded in a solution of 1% triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). Infarct size was determined as TTC-negative areas as a percentage of total left ventricular area. On MSCT images, infarct size per slice was calculated by dividing the DHE area by the total slice area (%) and compared with histochemical analyses.

resultsSerial MSCT scans revealed a peak CT attenuation of the infarct area (222.5 ± 36.5 Hounsfield units) with a maximum mean difference in CT attenuation between the infarct areas and normal myocardium of at 2 minutes after contrast injection (106.4; P for difference = 0.002). Furthermore, the percentage difference of infarct size by MSCT vs histopathologic specimen was significantly lower at 2 (8.5% ± 1.8%) and 5 minutes (9.5% ± 1.9%) than those after 7 minutes. Direct comparisons of slice-matched DHE area by MSCT demonstrated excellent correlation with TTC-derived infarct size (r = 0.952; P < .001). Bland-Altman plots of the differences between DHE by MSCT and TTC-derived infarct measurements plotted against their means showed good agreement between the 2 methods.

conclusionThe feasibility of myocardial viability assessment by DHE using MSCT after conventional ICA was proven in experimental models, and the optimal viability images were obtained after 2 to 5 minutes after the final intracoronary injection of contrast agent for conventional ICA.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyFemaleMultidetector Computed TomographyMultimodal ImagingMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial StunningRadiography, InterventionalReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySwineTissue SurvivalContrast MediaMultislice computed tomographyMyocardial contrast delayed enhancementMyocardial viability

Identifiers

PMID26088379
PMCPMC4578173
OpenAlexW1669884216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.