Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088328›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA

Post-transcriptional regulation in corticogenesis: how RNA-binding proteins help build the brain.

Louis-Jan Pilaz, Debra L Silver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Loss of RNA-Binding Protein HuR Leads to Defective Ependymal Cells and Hydrocephalus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  19. RNA processing in neurological tissue: development, aging and disease.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louis-Jan PilazDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Debra L SilverDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Training Program in Developmental & Stem Cell BiologyT32HD040372 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Terry H Lechler · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
Mechanisms of neural progenitor division in the developing brainR01NS083897 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SILVER, DEBRA · 2013 to 2023
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040372NINDS NIH HHS R01NS0830897NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebral cortex, the brain structure responsible for our higher cognitive functions, is built during embryonic development in a process called corticogenesis. During corticogenesis, neural stem cells generate distinct populations of progenitors and excitatory neurons. These new neurons migrate radially in the cortex, eventually forming neuronal layers and establishing synaptic connections with other neurons both within and outside the cortex. Perturbations to corticogenesis can result in severe neurodevelopmental disorders, thus emphasizing the need to better understand molecular regulation of brain development. Recent studies in both model organisms and humans have collectively highlighted roles for post-transcriptional regulation in virtually all steps of corticogenesis. Genomic approaches have revealed global RNA changes associated with spatial and temporal regulation of cortical development. Additionally, genetic studies have uncovered RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) critical for cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration within the developing neocortex. Many of these same RBPs play causal roles in neurodevelopmental pathologies. In the developing neocortex, RBPs influence diverse steps of mRNA metabolism, including splicing, stability, translation, and localization. With the advent of new technologies, researchers have begun to uncover key transcripts regulated by these RBPs. Given the complexity of the developing mammalian cortex, a major challenge for the future will be to understand how dynamic RNA regulation occurs within heterogeneous cell populations, across space and time. In sum, post-transcriptional regulation has emerged as a critical mechanism for driving corticogenesis and exciting direction of future research.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansNeocortexOrganogenesisRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26088328
PMCPMC4624281
OpenAlexW2130240233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.