Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088181›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2016

The significance of autoantibodies to DFS70/LEDGFp75 in health and disease: integrating basic science with clinical understanding.

Robert L Ochs, Michael Mahler, Anamika Basu, Leslimar Rios-Colon, Tino W Sanchez, Luis E Andrade, Marvin J Fritzler, Carlos A Casiano

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert L OchsVentana Medical, Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Michael MahlerDepartment of Research, Inova Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Anamika BasuDepartment of Basic Sciences, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Mortensen Hall 142, 11085 Campus St, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Leslimar Rios-ColonDepartment of Basic Sciences, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Mortensen Hall 142, 11085 Campus St, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Tino W SanchezDepartment of Basic Sciences, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Mortensen Hall 142, 11085 Campus St, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Luis E AndradeRheumatology Division, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, and Immunology Division, Fleury Medicine and Health Laboratories, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marvin J FritzlerFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Carlos A CasianoDepartment of Basic Sciences, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Mortensen Hall 142, 11085 Campus St, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA. ccasiano@llu.edu.
Loma Linda University · USNova Medical (United States) · USUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Calgary · CAVentana Research Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

NIH-LLU Initiative for Maximizing Student DiversityR25GM060507 · NIGMS · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI DE LEON, MARINO · 2001 to 2022
$11.3M
Research Training/Education CoreP20MD006988 · NIMHD · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI DE LEON, MARINO · 2012 to 2016
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060507NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD006988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) displaying the nuclear dense fine speckled immunofluorescence (DFS-IIF) pattern in HEp-2 substrates are commonly observed in clinical laboratory referrals. They target the dense fine speckled autoantigen of 70 kD (DFS70), most commonly known as lens epithelium-derived growth factor p75 (LEDGFp75). Interesting features of these ANAs include their low frequency in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), elevated prevalence in apparently healthy individuals, IgG isotype, strong trend to occur as the only ANA specificity in serum, and occurrence in moderate to high titers. These autoantibodies have also been detected at varied frequencies in patients with diverse non-SARD inflammatory and malignant conditions such as atopic diseases, asthma, eye diseases, and prostate cancer. These observations have recently stimulated vigorous research on their clinical and biological significance. Some studies have suggested that they are natural, protective antibodies that could serve as biomarkers to exclude a SARD diagnosis. Other studies suggest that they might be pathogenic in certain contexts. The emerging role of DFS70/LEDGFp75 as a stress protein relevant to human acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, cancer, and inflammation also points to the possibility that these autoantibodies could be sensors of cellular stress and inflammation associated with environmental factors. In this comprehensive review, we integrate our current knowledge of the biology of DFS70/LEDGFp75 with the clinical understanding of its autoantibodies in the contexts of health and disease.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAutoantibodiesHumansTranscription FactorsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAutoantibodiesPSIP1 protein, humanTranscription FactorsAntinuclear autoantibodiesAutoimmunityDFS70/LEDGFp75InflammationStress

Identifiers

PMID26088181
PMCPMC4684813
OpenAlexW2188299787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.