Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088178›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2015

Correlation between biomechanical properties of the annulus fibrosus and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.

Zhi Shan, Shengyun Li, Junhui Liu, Maiwulanjiang Mamuti, Chongyan Wang, Fengdong Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ISSLS PRIZE IN BASIC SCIENCE 2020: Beyond microstructure-circumferential specialization within the lumbar intervertebral disc annulus extends to collagen nanostructure, with counterintuitive relationships to macroscale material properties.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  16. Does T2 mapping of the posterior annulus fibrosus indicate the presence of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation? A 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  17. The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Lumbar spinal degenerative "microinstability": hype or hope? Proposal of a new classification to detect it and to assess surgical treatment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhi ShanDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, No. 3, Qingchun Road East, Hangzhou, 310016, People's Republic of China.
Shengyun Li
Junhui Liu
Maiwulanjiang Mamuti
Chongyan Wang
Fengdong Zhao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the regional tensile properties of human annulus fibrosus (AF) and relate them to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.

methods44 human cadaveric lumbar spines were harvested (24 male, 20 female, aged 25-64 years). MRI was used to identify Pfirrmann grade of disc degeneration, and Modic changes (MCs). Intervertebral discs were then removed and dissected into five regions: nucleus pulposus, anterior AF, anterolateral AF, lateral AF, and posterolateral AF. Samples for tensile testing (1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 5 mm) were removed from inner, middle and outer parts of each region.

results1969 specimens from 189 discs were stretched to failure. Average tensile stiffness (modulus) increased from 4.80 MPa in the inner AF to 13.0 MPa in the outer AF. Strength (UTS) increased similarly, from 1.18 to 3.29 MPa, whereas elongation at failure decreased, from 49 to 38%. The only significant change with age was a reduction in UTS in the middle annulus. In contrast, severe grades of disc degeneration were associated with consistent and highly significant reductions in tensile properties. Effects were greatest in the outer AF, where stiffness and strength fell by 29 and 43%, respectively. Modic changes also were associated with reduced stiffness and strength, but here the effects were greatest in the inner and middle AF.

conclusionWeakening of degenerated AF may be caused by accumulating structural defects, and enzymatic degradation. MRI has the potential to identify local weakening of the AF.

Indexed as

Lumbosacral RegionAdultAgingBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedTensile Strength

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.