Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26088160›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Direct interaction between centralspindlin and PRC1 reinforces mechanical resilience of the central spindle.

Kian-Yong Lee, Behrooz Esmaeili, Ben Zealley, Masanori Mishima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Enucleation of theLife science alliance · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Coupling of microtubule bundles isolates them from local disruptions to set the structural stability of the anaphase spindle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanistic insights into central spindle assembly mediated by the centralspindlin complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Structural View on ESCRT-Mediated Abscission.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kian-Yong LeeWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Behrooz EsmaeiliDivision of Biomedical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Ben ZealleyWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Masanori MishimaDivision of Biomedical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBWellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11985Cancer Research UK A11985Cancer Research UK C19769/A6356Cancer Research UK C19769/A8024Cancer Research UK C6946/A14492Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During animal cell division, the central spindle, an anti-parallel microtubule bundle structure formed between segregating chromosomes during anaphase, cooperates with astral microtubules to position the cleavage furrow. Because the central spindle is the only structure linking the two halves of the mitotic spindle, it is under mechanical tension from dynein-generated cortical pulling forces, which determine spindle positioning and drive chromosome segregation through spindle elongation. The central spindle should be flexible enough for efficient chromosome segregation while maintaining its structural integrity for reliable cytokinesis. How the cell balances these potentially conflicting requirements is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the central spindle in C. elegans embryos has a resilient mechanism for recovery from perturbations by excess tension derived from cortical pulling forces. This mechanism involves the direct interaction of two different types of conserved microtubule bundlers that are crucial for central spindle formation, PRC1 and centralspindlin.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCytokinesisKinesinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataSpindle ApparatusStress, MechanicalCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCYK-4 protein, C elegansKinesinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsSPD-1 protein, C elegansZEN-4 protein, C elegans

Identifiers

PMID26088160
PMCPMC4557309
OpenAlexW2263451797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.