Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26087847›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2015

Stigmatising attitudes of undergraduates towards their peers with depression: a cross-sectional study in Sri Lanka.

Santushi D Amarasuriya, Anthony F Jorm, Nicola J Reavley, Andrew J Mackinnon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Changes in Attitudes toward Mental Illness in Healthcare Professionals and Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Santushi D AmarasuriyaBehavioural Sciences Stream, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, No. 25, PO Box 271, Kynsey Road, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka. santushi@gmail.com.
Anthony F JormCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, 207 Bouverie Street, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. ajorm@unimelb.edu.au.
Nicola J ReavleyCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, 207 Bouverie Street, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. nreavley@unimelb.edu.au.
Andrew J MackinnonOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, 3052, Melbourne, Australia. Andrew.Mackinnon@unimelb.edu.au.
Melbourne Health · AUOrygen Youth Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited research examining mental health-related stigma of undergraduates in non-western developing countries. This study examined stigma of undergraduates in Sri Lanka towards another depressed undergraduate.

methodsA hypothetical vignette of an undergraduate suffering from depression was presented. A total of 4650 undergraduates responded to scales assessing their personal stigma towards and desire for social distance from this individual. Exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) was performed to determine the dimensionality and loading pattern of the items on these two stigma scales. Multiple linear regressions were used to explore correlates of the identified dimensions of stigma.

resultsPrevious findings that the Social Distance Scale forms a single dimension and that the Personal Stigma Scale consists of two dimensions were supported. However, the measurement structure of the dimensions of stigma on the latter scales, labelled 'Weak-not-Sick' and 'Dangerous-Undesirable' , differed from previous work. A high level of stigma in relation to the 'Weak-not-Sick' Scale was observed. However, some correlates associated with lower levels of stigma on this scale, such as being in the Medical Faculty, were associated with higher levels of stigma on the 'Dangerous-Undesirable' and 'Social Distance' scales. In contrast, labelling the problem as a mental health-related problem, with absence of specific psychiatric terminology, was associated with lower levels of stigma on these latter two scales. Exposure to a mental health problem in family or friends or from personal experience was also associated with lower stigma on the Social Distance Scale. However, the effect sizes of these relationships were small.

conclusionsThe findings highlight differences in the measurement structure and score distribution of the 'Weak-not-Sick' and 'Dangerous-Undesirable' scales when used in different cultural and demographic contexts. The dimensionality of stigma relevant to these scales must always be established prior to their use in different contexts. Furthermore, campaigns targeted at improving knowledge about depression as a real illness and as a psychiatric condition need to ensure that such attempts are not associated with increases in other aspects of stigma.

Indexed as

AttitudePeer GroupStereotypingUniversitiesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological DistanceSri LankaStudents

Identifiers

PMID26087847
PMCPMC4472246
OpenAlexW1792244634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.