Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26087680›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2015

Crosstalk between the nociceptive and immune systems in host defence and disease.

Stephen B McMahon, Federica La Russa, David L H Bennett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Peripheral nerve injury reduces macrophage efferocytosis to facilitate neuropathic pain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen B McMahonKing's College London, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Federica La RussaKing's College London, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.
David L H BennettNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095698Wellcome Trust 102645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nociceptors and immune cells both protect the host from potential threats to homeostasis. There is growing evidence for bidirectional signalling between these two systems, and the underlying mechanisms are beginning to be elucidated. An understanding is emerging of how both the adaptive and innate immune systems can activate and sensitize nociceptors, and, reciprocally, how nociceptors modulate immune cells. In this Review, we discuss how these interactions can be adaptive and useful to the organism but also consider when such signalling might be maladaptive and pathophysiological, contributing to immune-mediated diseases and persistent pain states.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsHost SpecificityHumansImmune SystemImmune System DiseasesImmunity, CellularImmunity, InnateNociceptorsPain

Identifiers

PMID26087680
OpenAlexW2104661780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.