Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26087476›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout of NANOG and NANOGP8 decreases the malignant potential of prostate cancer cells.

Norihiko Kawamura, Keisuke Nimura, Hiromichi Nagano, Sohei Yamaguchi, Norio Nonomura, Yasufumi Kaneda

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pseudogenes in the carcinogenesis: epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition process and cancer initiating cells.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. NAT10-mediated acHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Heliyon · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. CRISPR-Cas technology a new era in genomic engineering.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Norihiko KawamuraDivision of Gene Therapy Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Keisuke NimuraDivision of Gene Therapy Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Hiromichi NaganoDivision of Gene Therapy Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Sohei YamaguchiDivision of Gene Therapy Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Norio NonomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Yasufumi KanedaDivision of Gene Therapy Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NANOG expression in prostate cancer is highly correlated with cancer stem cell characteristics and resistance to androgen deprivation. However, it is not clear whether NANOG or its pseudogenes contribute to the malignant potential of cancer. We established NANOG- and NANOGP8-knockout DU145 prostate cancer cell lines using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Knockouts of NANOG and NANOGP8 significantly attenuated malignant potential, including sphere formation, anchorage-independent growth, migration capability, and drug resistance, compared to parental DU145 cells. NANOG and NANOGP8 knockout did not inhibit in vitro cell proliferation, but in vivo tumorigenic potential decreased significantly. These phenotypes were recovered in NANOG- and NANOGP8-rescued cell lines. These results indicate that NANOG and NANOGP8 proteins are expressed in prostate cancer cell lines, and NANOG and NANOGP8 equally contribute to the high malignant potential of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsCell ProliferationCRISPR-Associated ProteinsGene Knockout TechniquesHeterograftsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDNanog Homeobox ProteinProstatic NeoplasmsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsNanog Homeobox ProteinNANOG protein, humanCRISPR/Cas9gene knockoutNANOGNANOGP8prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID26087476
PMCPMC4673169
OpenAlexW2148554000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.