Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26087177›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Evolutionary Trends of the Transposase-Encoding Open Reading Frames A and B (orfA and orfB) of the Mycobacterial IS6110 Insertion Sequence.

Sara Thabet, Amine Namouchi, Helmi Mardassi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. In-depth Analysis of ISFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara ThabetUnit of Typing and Genetics of Mycobacteria, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Vaccinology, and Biotechnology Development; Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Amine NamouchiUnit of Typing and Genetics of Mycobacteria, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Vaccinology, and Biotechnology Development; Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Helmi MardassiUnit of Typing and Genetics of Mycobacteria, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Vaccinology, and Biotechnology Development; Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe IS6110 insertion sequence, a member of the IS3 family of insertion sequences, was found to be specific to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). Although IS6110 has been extensively characterized as a transposable genetic marker, the evolutionary history of its own transposase-encoding sequence has not, to the best of our knowledge, been investigated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHere we explored the evolution of the IS6110 sequence by analysing the genetic variability and the selective forces acting on its transposase-encoding open reading frames (ORFs) A and B (orfA and orfB). For this purpose, we used a strain collection consisting of smooth tubercle bacilli (STB), an early branching lineage of the MTBC, and present-day M. tuberculosis strains representing the full breadth of genetic diversity in Tunisia. In each ORF, we found a major haplotype that dominated over a flat distribution of rare descendent haplotypes, consisting mainly of single- and double-nucleotide variant singletons. The predominant haplotypes consisted of both ancestral and present-day strains, suggesting that IS6110 acquisition predated the emergence of the MTBC. There was no evidence of recombination and both ORFs were subjected to strict purifying selection, as demonstrated by their dN/dS ratios (0.29 and 0.51, respectively), as well as their significantly negative Tajima's D statistics. Strikingly, the purifying selection acting on orfA proved much more stringent, suggesting its critical role in regulating the transpositional process. Maximum likelihood analyses further excluded any possibility of positive selection acting on single amino acid residues. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Taken together our data fit with an evolutionary scenario according to which the observed variability pattern of the IS6110 transposase-encoding ORFs is generated mainly through random point mutations that accrued on a functionally optimal IS6110 copy, whose acquisition predated the emergence of the MTBC complex. Background selection acting against deleterious mutations led to an excess of low-frequency variants.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularOpen Reading FramesBase SequenceDNA Transposable ElementsHumansMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium tuberculosisPhylogenyPoint MutationPolymorphism, GeneticSequence AlignmentTransposasesTuberculosisDNA Transposable ElementsTransposases

Identifiers

PMID26087177
PMCPMC4473070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.