ArticlePloS one2015
Evolutionary Trends of the Transposase-Encoding Open Reading Frames A and B (orfA and orfB) of the Mycobacterial IS6110 Insertion Sequence.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- In-depth Analysis of ISFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Transposition mechanism, molecular characterization and evolution of IS6110, the specific evolutionary marker of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.Molecular biology reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe IS6110 insertion sequence, a member of the IS3 family of insertion sequences, was found to be specific to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). Although IS6110 has been extensively characterized as a transposable genetic marker, the evolutionary history of its own transposase-encoding sequence has not, to the best of our knowledge, been investigated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsHere we explored the evolution of the IS6110 sequence by analysing the genetic variability and the selective forces acting on its transposase-encoding open reading frames (ORFs) A and B (orfA and orfB). For this purpose, we used a strain collection consisting of smooth tubercle bacilli (STB), an early branching lineage of the MTBC, and present-day M. tuberculosis strains representing the full breadth of genetic diversity in Tunisia. In each ORF, we found a major haplotype that dominated over a flat distribution of rare descendent haplotypes, consisting mainly of single- and double-nucleotide variant singletons. The predominant haplotypes consisted of both ancestral and present-day strains, suggesting that IS6110 acquisition predated the emergence of the MTBC. There was no evidence of recombination and both ORFs were subjected to strict purifying selection, as demonstrated by their dN/dS ratios (0.29 and 0.51, respectively), as well as their significantly negative Tajima's D statistics. Strikingly, the purifying selection acting on orfA proved much more stringent, suggesting its critical role in regulating the transpositional process. Maximum likelihood analyses further excluded any possibility of positive selection acting on single amino acid residues. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Taken together our data fit with an evolutionary scenario according to which the observed variability pattern of the IS6110 transposase-encoding ORFs is generated mainly through random point mutations that accrued on a functionally optimal IS6110 copy, whose acquisition predated the emergence of the MTBC complex. Background selection acting against deleterious mutations led to an excess of low-frequency variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.