Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26087173›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2016

Cystic fibrosis carrier screening effects on birth prevalence and newborn screening.

Carlo Castellani, Luigi Picci, Gloria Tridello, Elia Casati, Anna Tamanini, Lucia Bartoloni, Maurizio Scarpa, Baroukh M Assael, Veneto CF Lab Network

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Role of ExtendedInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Review
  10. Newborn Screening for CF across the Globe-International journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carlo CastellaniCystic Fibrosis Center, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1916-0963
Luigi PicciDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Gloria TridelloCystic Fibrosis Center, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Elia CasatiCystic Fibrosis Center, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Anna TamaniniClinical Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Lucia BartoloniULSS 12 "Veneziana"-Ospedale SS.Giovanni e Paolo-Venezia, Venezia, Italy.
Maurizio ScarpaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Baroukh M AssaelCystic Fibrosis Center, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Veneto CF Lab Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the effects of cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening on birth prevalence trends and newborn screening (NBS) efficiency by comparing two Italian regions; carrier screening was performed in one region (eastern region (ER)) and not in the other (western region (WR)).

methodsAnnual births of infants with CF, NBS false-positive results, NBS uncertain diagnoses (borderline sweat chloride (BSC)), carrier tests performed, and carriers detected were monitored during the 1993-2013 period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsA total of 259 newborns with CF were detected. In the ER, 150 carrier couples were found. Mean annual percentage of birth prevalence decrease was 9% per 10,000 (P = 0.002) and was greater in the ER (15%, P = 0.0008; WR 1%, P = ns). The WR estimated birth prevalence was 1/3,589 in 1993 and 1/3,870 in 2013; in the ER it was 1/2,730 in 1993 and 1/14,200 in 2013. The ER birth prevalence correlated inversely with the number of carrier couples (P = 0.0032). The ratio between CF cases and NBS-positive results significantly decreased in the ER (1.6%, P = 0.0001) but not in the WR. The ratio between prevalence of BSC and of CF cases increased in the ER (P = 0.008) but not in the WR (P = 0.1).

conclusionCarrier screening was connected with a decrease in birth prevalence of CF. Poorer NBS performance was observed in the carrier screening area.

Indexed as

HeterozygoteNeonatal ScreeningCystic FibrosisGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornItalyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID26087173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.