Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26087128›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Association between Body Mass Index and Health-Related Quality of Life: The "Obesity Paradox" in 21,218 Adults of the Chinese General Population.

Yanbo Zhu, Qi Wang, Guoming Pang, Lin Lin, Hideki Origasa, Yangyang Wang, Jie Di, Mai Shi, Chunpok Fan, Huimei Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nutritional Determinants of Quality of Life in a Mediterranean Cohort: The SUN Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Health-related quality of life and related factors among pregnant women.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yanbo ZhuSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Qi WangSchool of Preclinical Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Guoming PangInternal Medicine Department, Kaifeng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Lin LinDepartment of Quality Management, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hideki OrigasaDivision of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Yangyang WangSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jie DiSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mai ShiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chunpok FanSchool of Preclinical Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Huimei ShiSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere was no consistent recognition of the association between high or low body mass index (BMI) and health related quality of life (HRQL). The aim of this research was to study the association between BMI and HRQL in Chinese adults, and to further explore the stability of that association in the subgroup analysis stratified by status of chronic conditions.

methodsA total of 21,218 adults aged 18 and older were classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight, class I obese, and class II obese based on their BMI. HRQL was measured by the SF-36 Health Survey. The independent impact of each BMI category on HRQL was examined through standard least squares regression by comparing the difference of SF-36 scores and the minimum clinically important differences (MCID), which was defined as 3 points.

resultsCompared to the normal weight, the class I obese was significantly associated with better HRQL scores in the mental component summary (MCS) (75.1 vs. 73.4, P<0.001). The underweight had the lowest score in both the physical components summary (PCS) (75.4 vs. 77.5, P<0.001) and mental components summary (MCS) (71.8 vs. 73.4, P<0.001). For the MCID, the HRQL score was reduced by more than 3 points in the physical functioning for the class II obese (D=-3.43) and the general health for the underweight (D=-3.71). Stratified analyses showed a similar result in the health subjects and chronic conditions, and it was significant in the chronic conditions.

conclusionsThe class I obese showed the best HRQL, especially in the mental domain. The worst HRQL was found in the underweight. The class II obese reduced HRQL in the physical functioning only. "Obesity paradox" was more obvious in the participants with chronic conditions.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHealth StatusHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightThinness

Identifiers

PMID26087128
PMCPMC4472696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.