Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26086920›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2015

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Timing of Elevated Intraocular Pressure After Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE Study Report 15.

Ahmad A Aref, Ingrid U Scott, Neal L Oden, Michael S Ip, Barbara A Blodi, Paul C VanVeldhuisen, SCORE Study Investigator Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00105027 (The Standard Care vs. COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00105027 phase3completednot on this map

The Standard Care vs. COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study: Two Randomized Trials to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Injection(s) of Triamcinolone Acetonide With Standard Care to Treat Macular Edema

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Emmes Company, LLCRan2004 to 2009Enrolled682ConditionsMacular Edema, Cystoid, Retinal Vein OcclusionArmsStandard Care, intravitreal triamcinolone injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Intraocular pressure: Focus on corticosteroids.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad A ArefIllinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Medicine.
Ingrid U ScottDepartment of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Neal L OdenThe EMMES Corporation, Rockville, Maryland.
Michael S IpUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison.
Barbara A BlodiUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison.
Paul C VanVeldhuisenThe EMMES Corporation, Rockville, Maryland.
SCORE Study Investigator Group
Emmes (United States) · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI YAO, XINCHENG · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
The Intravitreal Corticosteroid for Macular Edema StudyU10EY014351 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI IP, MICHAEL S · 2003 to 2008
$11.5M
SCORE2 Comparative Trial (SCT)U10EY023529 · NEI · THE EMMES COMPANY, LLC · PI VAN VELDHUISEN, PAUL C · 2013 to 2018
$6.8M
Intravitreal Corticosteroid for Macular EdemaU10EY014404 · NEI · THE EMMES COMPANY, LLC · PI VAN VELDHUISEN, PAUL C · 2003 to 2008
$3.8M
Intravitreal Corticosteroid for Macular Edema StudyU10EY014352 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BLODI, BARBARA A · 2003 to 2008
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS 5U10EY014351NEI NIH HHS 5U10EY014352NEI NIH HHS 5U10EY014404NEI NIH HHS EY001792NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014351NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014352NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014404NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe Standard of Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study showed that intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) is effective at reducing macular edema and improving visual acuity in participants with retinal vein occlusion. Secondary analysis of the incidence, risk factors, and timing of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation occurring after IVTA provides guidance for clinical decision making and management of patients treated with IVTA.

objectiveTo investigate the incidence, risk factors, and time course of IOP elevation in participants in the SCORE Study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsSecondary analysis conducted from August through December 2014 of a prospective, randomized clinical trial featuring an evaluable population conducted at 75 clinical sites. Six hundred eighty-two patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion were enrolled in the study. The SCORE Study enrollment period ran from November 4, 2004, to February 29, 2008, with participant follow-up ending February 28, 2009.

interventionsStudy participants were randomized to standard of care, 1 mg of IVTA, or 4 mg of IVTA therapy and followed up for a mean (SD) of 24.7 (10.3) months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Intraocular pressure elevation greater than 10 mm Hg from baseline.

resultsKaplan-Meier incidences of IOP elevation greater than 10 mm Hg from baseline at 36 months were 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.06), 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05-0.14), and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.38-0.53) in the standard of care, 1-mg IVTA, and 4-mg IVTA groups, respectively. The rates of IOP-related events were higher for the 4-mg IVTA group compared with the other groups (P ≤ .001 for main outcome measure). Younger age, 4-mg IVTA vs 1-mg IVTA treatment, and higher baseline IOP were found to confer greater risk for IOP-related events (P < .05 for all). The median number of days from time of first injection to IOP elevation greater than 10 mm Hg from baseline was 34.0 and 52.5 days in participants treated with 1-mg and 4-mg IVTA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection therapy, in particular the 4-mg dose, is associated with an increased risk for IOP elevation. The risk factors for an IOP-related event include higher treatment dose, younger age, and higher baseline IOP. Intraocular pressure-related events may take several months from the time of first IVTA injection to occur. Clinicians should be mindful of these risk factors when assessing the risks and benefits of IVTA therapy and also of the need for long-term follow-up of participants at risk for this complication.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00105027.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansIncidenceIntraocular PressureIntravitreal InjectionsMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedOcular HypertensionRetinal Vein OcclusionRisk FactorsTime FactorsGlucocorticoidsTriamcinolone Acetonide

Identifiers

PMID26086920
PMCPMC6639714
OpenAlexW2152957810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.