ArticlePloS one2015
Optimal Ancient DNA Yields from the Inner Ear Part of the Human Petrous Bone.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
174 citing papers in PubMed, 474 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved DNA extraction from marine bones: A 15-year retrospective evaluation using an adapted Dabney extraction method.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Bony labyrinth taxonomic identification and long-term evolution of livestock in the Southwest and Central Asia.Royal Society open science · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive skeletal sampling for STR-based human identification in degraded marine remains.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Jomon genomics reveal cold adaptation in Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers of eastern Eurasia.Science advances · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary Exploration of Computed-Tomographic and Ancient-DNA Data of an Iron Age Skull From Latvia With Multiple Lytic Bone Lesions: Differential Diagnosis Between Metastatic Carcinoma, Multiple Myeloma and Skeletal Tuberculosis.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Mesopotamian ancient DNA reveals Iron Age integration of heterogeneous Bronze Age genetic ancestries following resettlement.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Ground squirrel coprolites preserve complex archives of ancient environmental DNA over 700,000 years.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- A large mass grave from the Early Iron Age indicates selective violence towards women and children in the Carpathian Basin.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Subsistence transition preceded population turnover in the eastern Colombian Andes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Ancient DNA studies performed in the forensic genetic laboratory in Slovenia: a narrative review.Croatian medical journal · 2026Review
- Review
- Reconstruction of the lifeways of Central European Late Bronze Age communities using ancient DNA, isotope and osteoarchaeological analyses.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cosmopolitanism in the depths of Barbaricum evidenced by archaeogenomic data from the Late Iron Age Goth community of the Masłomęcz group.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Demographic history of the Jomon people: insights from whole-mitogenome analysis.Anthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi · 2026Article
- µCT scanning effects on aDNA and a multi-step workflow for archaeological petrous portions.PloS one · 2026Article
- Continuity and discontinuity in Native American populations: Insights from ancient and modern mitochondrial DNA.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The invention and development of next or second generation sequencing methods has resulted in a dramatic transformation of ancient DNA research and allowed shotgun sequencing of entire genomes from fossil specimens. However, although there are exceptions, most fossil specimens contain only low (~ 1% or less) percentages of endogenous DNA. The only skeletal element for which a systematically higher endogenous DNA content compared to other skeletal elements has been shown is the petrous part of the temporal bone. In this study we investigate whether (a) different parts of the petrous bone of archaeological human specimens give different percentages of endogenous DNA yields, (b) there are significant differences in average DNA read lengths, damage patterns and total DNA concentration, and (c) it is possible to obtain endogenous ancient DNA from petrous bones from hot environments. We carried out intra-petrous comparisons for ten petrous bones from specimens from Holocene archaeological contexts across Eurasia dated between 10,000-1,800 calibrated years before present (cal. BP). We obtained shotgun DNA sequences from three distinct areas within the petrous: a spongy part of trabecular bone (part A), the dense part of cortical bone encircling the osseous inner ear, or otic capsule (part B), and the dense part within the otic capsule (part C). Our results confirm that dense bone parts of the petrous bone can provide high endogenous aDNA yields and indicate that endogenous DNA fractions for part C can exceed those obtained for part B by up to 65-fold and those from part A by up to 177-fold, while total endogenous DNA concentrations are up to 126-fold and 109-fold higher for these comparisons. Our results also show that while endogenous yields from part C were lower than 1% for samples from hot (both arid and humid) parts, the DNA damage patterns indicate that at least some of the reads originate from ancient DNA molecules, potentially enabling ancient DNA analyses of samples from hot regions that are otherwise not amenable to ancient DNA analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.