Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26086078›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Optimal Ancient DNA Yields from the Inner Ear Part of the Human Petrous Bone.

Ron Pinhasi, Daniel Fernandes, Kendra Sirak, Mario Novak, Sarah Connell, Songül Alpaslan-Roodenberg, Fokke Gerritsen, Vyacheslav Moiseyev, Andrey Gromov, Pál Raczky and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 474 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Demographic history of the Jomon people: insights from whole-mitogenome analysis.Anthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Ron PinhasiSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, Belfield, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Daniel FernandesSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, Belfield, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Kendra SirakDepartment of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Mario NovakSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, Belfield, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Sarah ConnellSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, Belfield, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Songül Alpaslan-Roodenbergindependent researcher, Santpoort-Noord, The Netherlands.
Fokke GerritsenNetherlands Institute in Turkey, Istiklal Caddesi, Nur-i Ziya Sokak 5, Beyoğlu, Istanbul, Turkey.
Vyacheslav MoiseyevPeter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera), Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab. 3, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Andrey GromovPeter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera), Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab. 3, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Pál RaczkyEötvös Loránd University University, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Múzeum körút 4/b, Budapest, Hungary.
Alexandra AndersEötvös Loránd University University, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Múzeum körút 4/b, Budapest, Hungary.
Michael PietrusewskyDepartment of Anthropology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Gary RollefsonWhitman College, Walla Walla, Washington, United States of America.
Marija JovanovicMuseum of Vojvodina, 21 000 Novi Sad, Ulica Dunavska 35, Serbia.
Hiep TrinhhoangInstitute of Archaeology, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Guy Bar-OzZinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel.
Marc OxenhamSchool of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Hirofumi MatsumuraSchool of Health Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Michael HofreiterInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, Faculty for Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknechtstr. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam Golm, Germany; Department of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
University College Dublin · IEEötvös Loránd University · HUPeter the Great's Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography · RUAustralian National University · AUCarmel (Israel) · ILEmory University · USSapporo Medical University · JPUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of York · GBWhitman College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invention and development of next or second generation sequencing methods has resulted in a dramatic transformation of ancient DNA research and allowed shotgun sequencing of entire genomes from fossil specimens. However, although there are exceptions, most fossil specimens contain only low (~ 1% or less) percentages of endogenous DNA. The only skeletal element for which a systematically higher endogenous DNA content compared to other skeletal elements has been shown is the petrous part of the temporal bone. In this study we investigate whether (a) different parts of the petrous bone of archaeological human specimens give different percentages of endogenous DNA yields, (b) there are significant differences in average DNA read lengths, damage patterns and total DNA concentration, and (c) it is possible to obtain endogenous ancient DNA from petrous bones from hot environments. We carried out intra-petrous comparisons for ten petrous bones from specimens from Holocene archaeological contexts across Eurasia dated between 10,000-1,800 calibrated years before present (cal. BP). We obtained shotgun DNA sequences from three distinct areas within the petrous: a spongy part of trabecular bone (part A), the dense part of cortical bone encircling the osseous inner ear, or otic capsule (part B), and the dense part within the otic capsule (part C). Our results confirm that dense bone parts of the petrous bone can provide high endogenous aDNA yields and indicate that endogenous DNA fractions for part C can exceed those obtained for part B by up to 65-fold and those from part A by up to 177-fold, while total endogenous DNA concentrations are up to 126-fold and 109-fold higher for these comparisons. Our results also show that while endogenous yields from part C were lower than 1% for samples from hot (both arid and humid) parts, the DNA damage patterns indicate that at least some of the reads originate from ancient DNA molecules, potentially enabling ancient DNA analyses of samples from hot regions that are otherwise not amenable to ancient DNA analyses.

Indexed as

FossilsArchaeologyDNADNA DamageEar, InnerHumansPetrous BoneSequence Analysis, DNADNA

Identifiers

PMID26086078
PMCPMC4472748
OpenAlexW632382092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.