Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26086005›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2015

Treatment of ocular rosacea: comparative study of topical cyclosporine and oral doxycycline.

Aysegul Arman, Duriye Deniz Demirseren, Tamer Takmaz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Rosacea-the updated S2k guideline].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Preferred practice patterns and review on rosacea.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Topical cyclosporine A therapy for dry eye syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Latest Advances in Rosacea Treatment: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Rosacea: Practical Guidance and Challenges for Clinical Management.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Dry Eye Disease: Consideration for Women's Health.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aysegul ArmanOphthalmology Clinic, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Duriye Deniz DemirserenDermatology Clinic, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Tamer TakmazOphthalmology Clinic, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the effectiveness of topical cyclosporine A emulsion with that of oral doxycycline for rosacea associated ocular changes and dry eye complaints.

methodsOne hundred and ten patients with rosacea were screened. Thirty-eight patients having rosacea associated eyelid and ocular surface changes and dry eye complaints were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: nineteen patients were given topical cyclosporine twice daily and nineteen patients were given oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for the first month and once daily for the following two months. Symptom and sign scores, ocular surface disease index questionnarie and tear function tests were evaluated at baseline and monthly for 3mo. Three months after results were compared with that of baseline.

resultsMean values of symptom, eyelid sign and corneal/conjunctival sign scores of each treatment group at baseline and 3mo after treatments were compared and both drugs were found to be effective on rosacea associated ocular changes (P<0.001). Cyclosporine was more effective in symptomatic relief and in the treatment of eyelid signs (P=0.01). There was statistically significant increase in the mean Schirmer score with anesthesia and tear break up time scores in the cyclosporine treatment group compared to the doxycycline treatment group (P<0.05).

conclusionCyclosporine as a topical drug can be used in the treatment of rosacea associated ocular complications because it is more effective than doxycycline. In addition ocular rosacea as a chronic disease requires long term treatment and doxycycline has various side effects limiting its long term usage.

Indexed as

cyclosporine Adoxycyclinerosacea

Identifiers

PMID26086005
PMCPMC4458660
OpenAlexW602974993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.